What if the jury is biased?

Jurors who enter the courtroom with a bias towards the prosecution are more likely to see the evidence from the prosecution's perspective, and dismiss the evidence presented from the defence (and vice versa when jurors have a defence bias).

How did the US Supreme Court case of Witherspoon v Illinois affect jury selection?

Facts of the case An Illinois statute provides grounds for the dismissal of any juror with "conscientious scruples" against capital punishment. At Witherspoon's trial, the prosecution eliminated nearly half of the prospective jurors with qualms about capital punishment.

US Legal Forms
Localized Forms
Texas
Tarrant
Motion for Opportunity to Rehabilitate Any Prospective Juror Who...

Tarrant Texas Motion for Opportunity to Rehabilitate Any Prospective Juror Who Expresses Reticence When Asked to Kill a Fellow Human Being

Name: Tarrant Texas Motion for Opportunity to Rehabilitate Any Prospective Juror Who Expresses Reticence When Asked to Kill a Fellow Human Being
Brand: US Legal Forms
Rating: 4.55 (260 reviews)

Category:

Criminal - Jurors

State:

Multi-State

County:

Tarrant

Control #:

US-00796

Format:

Instant download

Description

This is a multi-state form covering the subject matter of the title: Motion for Opportunity to Rehabilitate Juror Who Expresses Reticence When Asked to Kill a Fellow Human Being.

Mediation and Arbitration Agreement

View this form

Petitioner - Affidavit and Petition for Or...

View this form

Liquidating Trust Agreement

View this form

How to fill out Tarrant Texas Motion For Opportunity To Rehabilitate Any Prospective Juror Who Expresses Reticence When Asked To Kill A Fellow Human Being?

How much time does it typically take you to create a legal document? Because every state has its laws and regulations for every life scenario, locating a Tarrant Motion for Opportunity to Rehabilitate Any Prospective Juror Who Expresses Reticence When Asked to Kill a Fellow Human Being meeting all regional requirements can be exhausting, and ordering it from a professional attorney is often costly. Many online services offer the most popular state-specific templates for download, but using the US Legal Forms library is most beneficial.

US Legal Forms is the most comprehensive online catalog of templates, gathered by states and areas of use. Aside from the Tarrant Motion for Opportunity to Rehabilitate Any Prospective Juror Who Expresses Reticence When Asked to Kill a Fellow Human Being, here you can get any specific form to run your business or individual affairs, complying with your regional requirements. Experts verify all samples for their validity, so you can be sure to prepare your paperwork correctly.

Using the service is pretty simple. If you already have an account on the platform and your subscription is valid, you only need to log in, select the needed sample, and download it. You can pick the file in your profile at any moment in the future. Otherwise, if you are new to the platform, there will be some extra steps to complete before you obtain your Tarrant Motion for Opportunity to Rehabilitate Any Prospective Juror Who Expresses Reticence When Asked to Kill a Fellow Human Being:

Examine the content of the page you’re on.
Read the description of the sample or Preview it (if available).
Look for another form using the related option in the header.
Click Buy Now when you’re certain in the selected file.
Decide on the subscription plan that suits you most.
Register for an account on the platform or log in to proceed to payment options.
Pay via PalPal or with your credit card.
Change the file format if needed.
Click Download to save the Tarrant Motion for Opportunity to Rehabilitate Any Prospective Juror Who Expresses Reticence When Asked to Kill a Fellow Human Being.
Print the sample or use any preferred online editor to fill it out electronically.

No matter how many times you need to use the purchased template, you can locate all the samples you’ve ever saved in your profile by opening the My Forms tab. Give it a try!

Form Rating

4.55

Satisfied(260)

Form popularity

FAQ

Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968), was a U.S. Supreme Court case where the court ruled that a state statute providing the state unlimited challenge for cause of jurors who might have any objection to the death penalty gave too much bias in favor of the prosecution.

Jurors who enter the courtroom with a bias towards the prosecution are more likely to see the evidence from the prosecution's perspective, and dismiss the evidence presented from the defence (and vice versa when jurors have a defence bias).

One is a peremptory challenge, for which no reason has to be given, but it can't be based on race, religion or ethnicity, and there are a limited amount these (usually nine). The other is a removal for cause challenge, on grounds that the person can't be impartial based on bias or conflict. These are unlimited.

Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968) "If the State had excluded only those prospective jurors who stated in advance of trial that they would not even consider returning a verdict of death, it could argue that the resulting jury was simply "neutral" with respect to penalty.

For cause - The law sets forth a number of reasons why jurors may be excused "for cause," that is, for a specified reason, such as bias or prejudice. For example, a juror who is related to or employed by one of the parties in the case may be excused for cause. There is no limit to the number of challenges for cause.

Facts of the case An Illinois statute provides grounds for the dismissal of any juror with "conscientious scruples" against capital punishment. At Witherspoon's trial, the prosecution eliminated nearly half of the prospective jurors with qualms about capital punishment.

Strike for cause (also referred to as challenge for cause or removal for cause) is a method of eliminating potential members from a jury panel in the United States.

A challenge that aims to disqualify a potential juror for some stated reason. Typical reasons include bias, prejudice, or prior knowledge that would prevent impartial evaluation of the evidence presented in court.

71 decision for Lockett The Court held that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments required, in all but the rarest capital cases, that sentencers not be precluded from considering a range of mitigating factors before imposing the death penalty.

An impartial jury is a jury that will consider a case fairly, without favoring or discriminating against anyone. The jury must be willing to look at the evidence open-mindedly. An impartial jury does not immediately assume guilt or innocence. They want to see the evidence and hear the arguments first.

Interesting Questions

More info

If you are asking to be permanently excused from jury service, you are still required to complete the questionnaire. ","You going up there to court and all?PROSPECTIVE JUROR SMITH: One in a car, one on a motorcycle. ","Chair Bock asked if there were any other questions.

Tarrant Texas Motion for Opportunity to Rehabilitate Any Prospective Juror Who Expresses Reticence When Asked to Kill a Fellow Human Being

Description

Related forms

Viewed forms

How to fill out Tarrant Texas Motion For Opportunity To Rehabilitate Any Prospective Juror Who Expresses Reticence When Asked To Kill A Fellow Human Being?

Show more info

Form Rating

Form popularity

FAQ

Why is Witherspoon v Illinois important?

What if the jury is biased?

What are two ways to eliminate potential jurors?

What 1968 case addressed the constitutionality of murder?

What are the two ways a potential juror can be excused?

How did the US Supreme Court case of Witherspoon v Illinois affect jury selection?

What is it called when a juror is removed for bias?

What does it mean when a prospective juror is challenged for cause?

What was the primary holding in Lockett v Ohio 1968 )?

What makes a jury impartial?

Interesting Questions

What is the Tarrant Motion for Opportunity to Rehabilitate?

Why would a prospective juror express reticence about killing a fellow human being?

What does it mean to rehabilitate a prospective juror?

How does the defense team rehabilitate a prospective juror expressing reticence?

Can a prospective juror be forced to kill someone in a trial?

What happens if a prospective juror's reticence cannot be alleviated?

More info

Trusted and secure by over 3 million people of the world’s leading companies