A Bronx New York Motion to Sequester Jurors Prior to and During the Trial of this Case is a legal request filed by either the prosecution or the defense in a criminal trial taking place in the Bronx, New York. This motion seeks to isolate the jurors from outside influences that may affect their impartiality and ability to render a fair verdict. The purpose of sequestering jurors is to prevent them from being exposed to potentially biased information or influences during the trial that could cloud their judgment. This can be particularly important in high-profile or controversial cases where the media coverage or public opinions could sway the jurors' opinions. Sequestering jurors prior to the trial refers to isolating them from any potential pre-trial publicity that may shape their views about the case. By limiting outside information, the motion aims to ensure that jurors make their decisions solely based on the evidence presented in court and the instructions given by the judge. During the trial, sequestration of jurors means that they are physically separated from the outside world for the duration of the proceedings. This includes being secluded from family, friends, media, and any other means of external communication. It also prevents jurors from conducting independent research or learning about the case through any other means besides what is presented within the courtroom. The motion to sequester jurors can be of different types, depending on the specific circumstances of the case: 1. Full sequestration: A complete separation of jurors from the public, where they are not allowed to return home during the entire trial. Jurors will be provided accommodations and will be closely monitored by court staff. 2. Partial sequestration: In this case, jurors are typically allowed to go home after each day of the trial but are instructed to avoid exposure to media coverage or discussions related to the case. 3. Limited sequestration: In certain situations, the sequestration may be limited to specific phases of the trial, such as during deliberations to prevent any external influence or tampering. The decision to grant or deny a Bronx New York Motion to Sequester Jurors Prior to and During the Trial of this Case is at the discretion of the judge presiding over the trial. Factors such as the nature of the case, its level of publicity, and the likelihood of outside influence will be considered before ruling on the motion. Ultimately, the goal is to uphold the defendant's constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial.