If a question of paternity of a child is raised, the parties have a right to submit that question to a jury for determination. Therefore, the issue is whether or not defendant is the father of this child. The question of the amount of support for the child or the mother is not for the jury's consideration.
Title: King Washington Instruction to Jury in a Paternity Case: Amount of Support is not a Question for the Jury Keywords: King Washington, instruction to jury, paternity case, amount of support, not a question, different types Description: In a paternity case, the King Washington instruction to the jury clearly states that the determination of the amount of support is not within their purview. This instruction directs the jury to focus solely on determining the biological relationship between the alleged father and the child, and not to consider or deliberate on the financial obligations associated with child support. Here we discuss the various types of King Washington instructions in a paternity case where the amount of support is not a question for the jury: 1. Standard King Washington Instruction: The standard King Washington instruction in a paternity case emphasizes that the jury's role is to determine whether the alleged father is biologically related to the child. This instruction categorically states that the amount of financial support is separate from the issue of establishing paternity, thereby guiding the jury to refrain from any consideration of support obligations. 2. Modified King Washington Instruction: In some instances, the court may provide a modified King Washington instruction. This modified instruction involves an additional warning or clarification, specifying that the jury's decision should remain solely focused on establishing paternity and should not be influenced by any thoughts or discussions related to child support. 3. Dual-Phase King Washington Instruction: In certain paternity cases, the court may employ a dual-phase King Washington instruction. The first phase requires the jury to determine the biological relationship between the alleged father and the child, following which the court presents evidence related to child support calculations during the second phase. This approach aims to prevent any potential bias or consideration of child support factors during the initial phase of determining paternity. 4. Clear and Concise King Washington Instruction: This type of instruction aims to provide a clear and concise statement to the jurors, emphasizing that the amount of support is not a question for them to deliberate upon. The main objective is to ensure that jurors fully understand their role and avoid any potential confusion or misunderstanding regarding their responsibilities in a paternity case. Note: It is crucial to consult with a legal professional well-versed in King Washington instructions as the specific types and wording may vary based on jurisdiction and the preferences of the presiding judge.Title: King Washington Instruction to Jury in a Paternity Case: Amount of Support is not a Question for the Jury Keywords: King Washington, instruction to jury, paternity case, amount of support, not a question, different types Description: In a paternity case, the King Washington instruction to the jury clearly states that the determination of the amount of support is not within their purview. This instruction directs the jury to focus solely on determining the biological relationship between the alleged father and the child, and not to consider or deliberate on the financial obligations associated with child support. Here we discuss the various types of King Washington instructions in a paternity case where the amount of support is not a question for the jury: 1. Standard King Washington Instruction: The standard King Washington instruction in a paternity case emphasizes that the jury's role is to determine whether the alleged father is biologically related to the child. This instruction categorically states that the amount of financial support is separate from the issue of establishing paternity, thereby guiding the jury to refrain from any consideration of support obligations. 2. Modified King Washington Instruction: In some instances, the court may provide a modified King Washington instruction. This modified instruction involves an additional warning or clarification, specifying that the jury's decision should remain solely focused on establishing paternity and should not be influenced by any thoughts or discussions related to child support. 3. Dual-Phase King Washington Instruction: In certain paternity cases, the court may employ a dual-phase King Washington instruction. The first phase requires the jury to determine the biological relationship between the alleged father and the child, following which the court presents evidence related to child support calculations during the second phase. This approach aims to prevent any potential bias or consideration of child support factors during the initial phase of determining paternity. 4. Clear and Concise King Washington Instruction: This type of instruction aims to provide a clear and concise statement to the jurors, emphasizing that the amount of support is not a question for them to deliberate upon. The main objective is to ensure that jurors fully understand their role and avoid any potential confusion or misunderstanding regarding their responsibilities in a paternity case. Note: It is crucial to consult with a legal professional well-versed in King Washington instructions as the specific types and wording may vary based on jurisdiction and the preferences of the presiding judge.
