A Judge should disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding where he or she:
" Has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party;
" Has personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts;
" Served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy;
" Practiced law with a lawyer who, during the time of this association, handled the case in question;
" Has been a material witness in the case, or has practiced law with a lawyer who is a material witness;
" Has a financial or other interest in the subject or parties to the proceeding, or a member of his or her immediate family has such an interest;
" Is a party to or a lawyer in the proceeding, or is related to one who is so involved in the proceeding;
" Knows of a relative who has an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding; or
" Is likely to be a material witness, or is related to one who is likely to be a material witness in proceeding.
King Washington Motion for Refusal of Judge — Removal refers to a legal request made by a party involved in a court case to remove a judge from presiding over their trial or hearing. This motion is typically filed when the party believes that the judge's impartiality or fairness is compromised, which could potentially affect the outcome of the case. In such instances, the motive behind the motion is to ensure a fair and unbiased trial, free from any potential influence or bias. The King Washington Motion for Refusal of Judge — Removal is a common legal document used in various jurisdictions and types of cases, including civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings. It is important to note that there may be certain variations or specific requirements depending on the jurisdiction or court rules. In some instances, this motion may also be referred to as the King Washington Motion for Disqualification of Judge, as the goal remains the same — to seek the removal of the judge from the case. The terminology may differ, but the intent remains consistent across jurisdictions. To file a King Washington Motion for Refusal of Judge — Removal, the party requesting refusal must provide valid grounds that support their claims of the judge's lack of impartiality. These grounds may include the judge's personal or professional relationship with any of the parties involved, a conflict of interest, bias, or any action or statement made by the judge that may raise doubts about their capacity to be fair and neutral. It is important to draft this motion carefully, as it is considered a serious matter that requires substantial evidence and legal reasoning to be successful. Parties must present persuasive arguments to convince the court that the judge's refusal is necessary to ensure a just and unbiased trial. In conclusion, the King Washington Motion for Refusal of Judge — Removal is a legal document used to request a judge's removal from a case due to concerns about their impartiality or fairness. Parties filing this motion must demonstrate valid grounds for refusal and present compelling arguments to support their request.
