The law regarding a motion attacking sentence of a federal court is set forth in 28 USC § 2255.
(a) A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act of Congress claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack, may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence.
(b) Unless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon the United States attorney, grant a prompt hearing thereon, determine the issues and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect thereto. If the court finds that the judgment was rendered without jurisdiction, or that the sentence imposed was not authorized by law or otherwise open to collateral attack, or that there has been such a denial or infringement of the constitutional rights of the prisoner as to render the judgment vulnerable to collateral attack, the court shall vacate and set the judgment aside and shall discharge the prisoner or resentence him or grant a new trial or correct the sentence as may appear appropriate.
(c) A court may entertain and determine such motion without requiring the production of the prisoner at the hearing.
(d) An appeal may be taken to the court of appeals from the order entered on the motion as from a final judgment on application for a writ of habeas corpus.
(e) An application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a prisoner who is authorized to apply for relief by motion pursuant to this section, shall not be entertained if it appears that the applicant has failed to apply for relief, by motion, to the court which sentenced him, or that such court has denied him relief, unless it also appears that the remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.
(f) A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to a motion under this section. The limitation period shall run from the latest of(1) the date on which the judgment of conviction becomes final;
(2) the date on which the impediment to making a motion created by governmental action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the movant was prevented from making a motion by such governmental action;
(3) the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if that right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review; or
(4) the date on which the facts supporting the claim or claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence.
(g) Except as provided in section 408 of the Controlled Substances Act, in all proceedings brought under this section, and any subsequent proceedings on review, the court may appoint counsel, except as provided by a rule promulgated by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority. Appointment of counsel under this section shall be governed by section 3006A of title 18.
(h) A second or successive motion must be certified as provided in section 2244 by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals to contain
(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or
(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.
A Hennepin Minnesota Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, Modify or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody is a legal remedy available to individuals who are currently in federal custody in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and believe that their sentence was unjust or requires correction. This motion allows individuals to challenge the validity or legality of their sentence through various grounds, such as constitutional violations, insufficient evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel, or newly discovered evidence. Keywords: Hennepin Minnesota, Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, Modify or Correct a Sentence, Federal Custody, legal remedy, Hennepin County, unjust sentence, correction, validity, legality, constitutional violations, insufficient evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence. Different types of Hennepin Minnesota Motions to Vacate, Set Aside, Modify or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody can include: 1. Motion to Vacate: This type of motion is filed when the individual believes their sentence should be completely voided due to a fundamental error, such as a violation of their constitutional rights or a lack of jurisdiction by the court. 2. Motion to Set Aside: This motion is filed when the person argues that their sentence should be set aside or declared null and void based on specific legal arguments, such as prosecutorial misconduct, newly discovered evidence, or errors in the legal process that led to their conviction. 3. Motion to Modify: This type of motion is submitted to request a modification or reduction of the existing sentence. Individuals may argue that their current sentence is too harsh or that certain circumstances have changed since their conviction, warranting a lesser punishment. 4. Motion to Correct: This motion is filed when an individual claims that an error occurred during the sentencing process that resulted in an inaccurate or unjust sentence. Examples could include mistakes in the calculation of the sentence, incorrect application of sentencing guidelines, or errors in the court's determination of facts relevant to the case. It is important to note that each motion requires specific legal arguments and supporting evidence. Individuals seeking to file a Hennepin Minnesota Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, Modify, or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody should consult with a qualified attorney who specializes in federal criminal law to assess the merits of their case and guide them through the complex legal process.
