A motion to quash asks the judge for an order setting aside or nullifying an action, such as "quashing" service of a summons.
This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.
Wayne, Michigan, Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum: Detailed Description A Wayne, Michigan, Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that the Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document that aims to challenge the validity of a subpoena in the state of Michigan. This motion argues that the subpoena is not properly justified and imposes an unnecessary burden on the recipient. In Wayne, Michigan, there are several types of motions to quash subpoenas that can be filed based on different grounds. Some commonly used grounds for filing a motion to quash include lack of relevance, undue burden, unreasonable scope, and oppressive nature of the subpoena. A motion to quash a subpoena based on the grounds of unreasonableness and oppressiveness typically argues that the subpoena seeks to elicit information or documents that are not relevant to the case and places an unnecessary burden on the recipient. It asserts that the information or documents requested have no bearing on the issues at hand and that complying with the subpoena would cause undue hardship, expense, or disruption. To strengthen the argument, the party filing the motion may provide supporting evidence or affidavits, explaining why the subpoena is unfair or oppressive. This evidence could include details about the excessive volume of documents being requested, the cost of complying with the subpoena, or the disruption it would cause to normal business operations or personal life. In Wayne, Michigan, a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum on the grounds that it is unreasonable and oppressive aims to protect individuals from being subjected to unnecessary time, expense, and inconvenience associated with producing documents or information that is irrelevant to the case. It is an important tool that ensures due process and fairness in legal proceedings. Keywords: Wayne, Michigan, motion to quash subpoena, duces tecum, unreasonable, oppressive, grounds, types, lack of relevance, undue burden, unreasonable scope, unreasonableness, oppressiveness, supporting evidence, affidavits, excessive volume, cost, disruption, due process, legal proceedings.
