A motion to quash asks the judge for an order setting aside or nullifying an action, such as "quashing" service of a summons.
This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.
A Hennepin Minnesota Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document filed in the Hennepin County court system. This affidavit is used to request the court's intervention in rejecting a subpoena duces tecum (a legally binding request for documents or evidence) that is deemed to be unreasonable and oppressive. The purpose of this document is to provide a detailed description and explanation as to why the subpoena should be quashed. In this affidavit, the affine (the person or entity filing the motion) must clearly outline why they believe the subpoena to be unreasonable and oppressive. The affidavit should include specific examples and arguments to support this claim. Keywords: Hennepin Minnesota, Affidavit, Motion to Quash, Subpoena Ducks Cecum, Unreasonable, Oppressive. There are no specific types of Hennepin Minnesota Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive. The content and structure of the affidavit will remain consistent regardless of the specific case or circumstances. However, the supporting arguments and evidence may vary depending on the individual situation.A Hennepin Minnesota Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document filed in the Hennepin County court system. This affidavit is used to request the court's intervention in rejecting a subpoena duces tecum (a legally binding request for documents or evidence) that is deemed to be unreasonable and oppressive. The purpose of this document is to provide a detailed description and explanation as to why the subpoena should be quashed. In this affidavit, the affine (the person or entity filing the motion) must clearly outline why they believe the subpoena to be unreasonable and oppressive. The affidavit should include specific examples and arguments to support this claim. Keywords: Hennepin Minnesota, Affidavit, Motion to Quash, Subpoena Ducks Cecum, Unreasonable, Oppressive. There are no specific types of Hennepin Minnesota Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive. The content and structure of the affidavit will remain consistent regardless of the specific case or circumstances. However, the supporting arguments and evidence may vary depending on the individual situation.