Most states have laws that provided that if a garnishee, personally summoned, shall fail to answer as required by law, the court shall enter a judgment against him for the amount of plaintiff's demand.
This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.
San Jose, California Motion for Default Judgment against Garnishee refers to a legal process undertaken in San Jose, California, where a party seeks a court order to obtain judgment against a garnishee who has failed to respond or comply with obligations related to a garnishment action. A garnishee in this context is an individual or entity that holds funds or assets belonging to a judgment debtor, who is the person owing a debt. This type of motion is typically pursued when a garnishee, despite being properly served with a writ of garnishment, fails to make required payments or provide necessary information to the judgment creditor. By filing a Motion for Default Judgment against Garnishee, the judgment creditor requests the court to find the garnishee in default and order them to satisfy the debt owed. Keywords: San Jose, California, Motion for Default Judgment, Garnishee, legal process, court order, judgment debtor, writ of garnishment, payments, information, judgment creditor, default, debt. Different types of San Jose, California Motion for Default Judgment against Garnishee may include: 1. Motion for Default Judgment based on Failure to Answer Interrogatories: This type of motion is filed when a garnishee fails to respond to written interrogatories, which are questions posed by the judgment creditor seeking information about the debtor's assets or income. 2. Motion for Default Judgment based on Failure to Pay Required Amount: In this case, the judgment creditor files a motion when the garnishee neglects to remit the required payments as outlined in the writ of garnishment. 3. Motion for Default Judgment based on Failure to Appear at Hearing: If a scheduled hearing regarding the garnishment action takes place, the garnishee's absence without a valid reason could lead to a motion for default judgment. 4. Motion for Default Judgment based on Failure to Deliver Property: This type of motion is appropriate when the garnishee fails to deliver the requested funds or assets belonging to the judgment debtor, despite being served with a writ of garnishment. 5. Motion for Default Judgment based on Failure to File an Answer: If the garnishee fails to file a timely response to the garnishment action, including any objections or defenses, the judgment creditor may file a motion for default judgment. These various types of motions address specific circumstances where a garnishee fails to meet their legal obligations, prompting the judgment creditor to request default judgment from the court. Keywords: Failure to Answer Interrogatories, Failure to Pay, Failure to Appear, Failure to Deliver Property, Failure to File an Answer, default judgment, specific circumstances.San Jose, California Motion for Default Judgment against Garnishee refers to a legal process undertaken in San Jose, California, where a party seeks a court order to obtain judgment against a garnishee who has failed to respond or comply with obligations related to a garnishment action. A garnishee in this context is an individual or entity that holds funds or assets belonging to a judgment debtor, who is the person owing a debt. This type of motion is typically pursued when a garnishee, despite being properly served with a writ of garnishment, fails to make required payments or provide necessary information to the judgment creditor. By filing a Motion for Default Judgment against Garnishee, the judgment creditor requests the court to find the garnishee in default and order them to satisfy the debt owed. Keywords: San Jose, California, Motion for Default Judgment, Garnishee, legal process, court order, judgment debtor, writ of garnishment, payments, information, judgment creditor, default, debt. Different types of San Jose, California Motion for Default Judgment against Garnishee may include: 1. Motion for Default Judgment based on Failure to Answer Interrogatories: This type of motion is filed when a garnishee fails to respond to written interrogatories, which are questions posed by the judgment creditor seeking information about the debtor's assets or income. 2. Motion for Default Judgment based on Failure to Pay Required Amount: In this case, the judgment creditor files a motion when the garnishee neglects to remit the required payments as outlined in the writ of garnishment. 3. Motion for Default Judgment based on Failure to Appear at Hearing: If a scheduled hearing regarding the garnishment action takes place, the garnishee's absence without a valid reason could lead to a motion for default judgment. 4. Motion for Default Judgment based on Failure to Deliver Property: This type of motion is appropriate when the garnishee fails to deliver the requested funds or assets belonging to the judgment debtor, despite being served with a writ of garnishment. 5. Motion for Default Judgment based on Failure to File an Answer: If the garnishee fails to file a timely response to the garnishment action, including any objections or defenses, the judgment creditor may file a motion for default judgment. These various types of motions address specific circumstances where a garnishee fails to meet their legal obligations, prompting the judgment creditor to request default judgment from the court. Keywords: Failure to Answer Interrogatories, Failure to Pay, Failure to Appear, Failure to Deliver Property, Failure to File an Answer, default judgment, specific circumstances.
