Montgomery Maryland Sample Letter for Response in connection with Motions for Summary Judgment

• Category: Letters - Legal - Motions
• State: Multi-State
• County: Montgomery
• Control #: US-0801LTR
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form is a sample letter in Word format covering the subject matter of the title of the form. Letter for Response to Motion for Summary Judgment in Montgomery, Maryland [Your Name] [Your Address] [City, State, ZIP Code] [Email Address] [Phone Number] [Date] [Opposing Party's Attorney Name] [Opposing Party's Attorney Address] [City, State, ZIP Code] Re: Response to Motion for Summary Judgment — Case No. [Case Number] Dear [Opposing Party's Attorney Name], I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing in response to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by your client in the above-mentioned case. I vehemently oppose the motion and would like to present the following arguments. 1. Standard of Review: It is vital to consider the appropriate standard of review for a motion for summary judgment in Montgomery, Maryland. As per Rule 2-501 of the Maryland Rules of Civil Procedure, a summary judgment should only be granted when no genuine dispute of material fact exists, and the moving is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 2. Genuine Issues of Material Fact: In reviewing the facts of this case, it becomes evident that there are genuine disputes over key material issues. It is imperative to present these disputed facts as they raise valid concerns regarding the appropriateness of granting summary judgment. These factual disputes cannot be resolved adequately without a full trial. 3. Evidentiary Support: Our opposition to the motion is supported by a multitude of evidence, including testimonies, documents, and expert reports. We will submit these pieces of evidence during trial to substantiate our claims and contradict the assertions made in the motion for summary judgment. 4. Legal Precedents: Numerous legal precedents established by the Montgomery County Circuit Court and the Maryland Court of Appeals favor denying summary judgment in cases with substantial disputed matters of fact and law. We will rely on these precedents to demonstrate that a trial is essential to fully examine and resolve the issues in contention. In light of the above reasons, I respectfully request that you withdraw the Motion for Summary Judgment. Moreover, considering the presence of genuine disputes of material fact and the need for a trial to render a just decision, I urge you to pursue alternative means of resolution, such as mediation or settlement negotiations. Should you choose to proceed with the motion, we will put forward a comprehensive memorandum of law within the time allotted by the Court. Additionally, we request ample opportunity for oral argument to present our case fully. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that we can find a fair resolution to this dispute. Please do not hesitate to contact me at the address provided above should you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, [Your Name] Enclosures: None

Letter for Response to Motion for Summary Judgment in Montgomery, Maryland [Your Name] [Your Address] [City, State, ZIP Code] [Email Address] [Phone Number] [Date] [Opposing Party's Attorney Name] [Opposing Party's Attorney Address] [City, State, ZIP Code] Re: Response to Motion for Summary Judgment — Case No. [Case Number] Dear [Opposing Party's Attorney Name], I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing in response to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by your client in the above-mentioned case. I vehemently oppose the motion and would like to present the following arguments. 1. Standard of Review: It is vital to consider the appropriate standard of review for a motion for summary judgment in Montgomery, Maryland. As per Rule 2-501 of the Maryland Rules of Civil Procedure, a summary judgment should only be granted when no genuine dispute of material fact exists, and the moving is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 2. Genuine Issues of Material Fact: In reviewing the facts of this case, it becomes evident that there are genuine disputes over key material issues. It is imperative to present these disputed facts as they raise valid concerns regarding the appropriateness of granting summary judgment. These factual disputes cannot be resolved adequately without a full trial. 3. Evidentiary Support: Our opposition to the motion is supported by a multitude of evidence, including testimonies, documents, and expert reports. We will submit these pieces of evidence during trial to substantiate our claims and contradict the assertions made in the motion for summary judgment. 4. Legal Precedents: Numerous legal precedents established by the Montgomery County Circuit Court and the Maryland Court of Appeals favor denying summary judgment in cases with substantial disputed matters of fact and law. We will rely on these precedents to demonstrate that a trial is essential to fully examine and resolve the issues in contention. In light of the above reasons, I respectfully request that you withdraw the Motion for Summary Judgment. Moreover, considering the presence of genuine disputes of material fact and the need for a trial to render a just decision, I urge you to pursue alternative means of resolution, such as mediation or settlement negotiations. Should you choose to proceed with the motion, we will put forward a comprehensive memorandum of law within the time allotted by the Court. Additionally, we request ample opportunity for oral argument to present our case fully. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that we can find a fair resolution to this dispute. Please do not hesitate to contact me at the address provided above should you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, [Your Name] Enclosures: None