Fulton Georgia Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is a crucial legal concept used in personal injury cases to determine the level of fault and liability between parties involved. This instruction aims to provide guidelines to the jury about how comparative negligence should be considered when determining damages awarded. Keywords: Fulton Georgia, jury instruction, comparative negligence defense, personal injury cases, fault, liability, damages awarded. There are various types of Fulton Georgia Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense, which include: 1. Pure Comparative Negligence: This type of defense allows the jury to assign a percentage of fault to each party involved in the accident, regardless of their level of negligence. The damages awarded to the plaintiff will be reduced according to their assigned percentage of fault. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence (50% Rule): Under this defense, the jury determines and assigns a percentage of fault to each party. However, the plaintiff can only recover damages if their assigned percentage of fault is 49% or less. If their assigned fault exceeds 49%, they are barred from receiving any compensation. 3. Modified Comparative Negligence (51% Rule): Similar to the 50% rule, this defense allows the plaintiff to recover damages only if their assigned percentage of fault does not exceed 50%. If their fault reaches or exceeds 51%, they will not receive any compensation. 4. Contributory Negligence: Although not technically categorized under comparative negligence, it is relevant to mention contributory negligence. Under this defense, if the plaintiff is found to be even slightly at fault, no matter how minimal, they are completely barred from recovering any damages. In Fulton Georgia, the jury instruction 1.1 provides detailed guidance to the jury on how to analyze and consider comparative negligence in personal injury cases. It ensures a fair and proportional assignment of fault, taking into account the actions of all involved parties.