Salt Lake Utah Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal instruction given to jurors in a civil trial regarding the defense of comparative negligence. This instruction provides guidance on how jurors should consider the apportionment of fault between the plaintiff and the defendant when determining liability and damages in a case. Keywords: Salt Lake Utah, jury instruction, 1.1, comparative negligence defense, civil trial, apportionment of fault, liability, damages. Different types of Salt Lake Utah Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense: 1. Pure Comparative Negligence Defense: This type of comparative negligence defense allows the jury to assign fault to both parties involved in the lawsuit, regardless of the extent of their respective negligence. The damages awarded to the plaintiff are reduced by their assigned percentage of fault. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence Defense (50% Bar Rule): Under this type of defense, the jury must determine if the plaintiff's negligence exceeds a certain threshold, typically 50%. If the plaintiff is found to be equally or more responsible for their injuries than the defendant, they are barred from recovering any damages. However, if the plaintiff's negligence is found to be below the threshold, their damages are reduced by their assigned percentage of fault. 3. Modified Comparative Negligence Defense (51% Bar Rule): Similar to the 50% bar rule, this type of comparative negligence defense sets the threshold at 51%. If the plaintiff's negligence is equal to or greater than this threshold, they cannot recover any damages. However, if their negligence falls below the threshold, their damages are reduced by their assigned percentage of fault. It is important for jurors to carefully consider the evidence presented and apply the appropriate comparative negligence defense based on the instructions provided by the court. By doing so, they can ensure a fair and just determination of liability and damages in a civil trial in Salt Lake Utah.