Phoenix Arizona Jury Instruction — 6.1 Raiding Key Employees is an essential instruction used in legal proceedings in Arizona that aims to provide guidance to the jury regarding cases involving the raiding of key employees. This instruction is designed to help the jury understand the relevant laws, concepts, and factors that come into play when determining liability and potential damages related to this particular issue. Key Employees in Phoenix Arizona are individuals who hold significant roles within a company or organization and possess valuable knowledge, skills, or access to critical trade secrets, customers, or proprietary information. When these key employees are recruited or induced to leave their current employer to join a competitor or start a competing business, it is referred to as "raiding." This instruction educates the jury on various aspects of raiding key employees, including the legal elements required to establish liability. It helps the jury understand the factors that determine liability, such as the existence of a valid employment contract or non-competition agreement, the nature of the employee's position, and the intent and actions of the raiding party. The jury is instructed to carefully consider the evidence presented to determine if the raiding party intentionally interfered with the employee's contractual or employment relationship with their former employer. Different types of Phoenix Arizona Jury Instruction — 6.1 Raiding Key Employees may include: 1. Direct Raiding: This refers to situations where the raiding party directly approaches and recruits key employees from their current employer, often through enticing offers or promises of better compensation or career opportunities. 2. Indirect Raiding: In this type of raiding, the raiding party may indirectly influence key employees to leave their current employer through means such as spreading negative information about the company, creating a hostile work environment, or enticing employees to leave through intermediaries. 3. Non-Competition Agreement Violation: This type of raiding involves key employees who have previously signed non-competition agreements with their current employer. If the raiding party induces these employees to join their organization in violation of these agreements, it may be deemed as raiding and can result in actionable legal claims. 4. Trade Secret Misappropriation: In some cases, raiding key employees also involves misappropriation of trade secrets belonging to their former employer. This type of raiding can lead to legal consequences and potential damages for the raiding party. It is important for the jury to carefully consider all the evidence presented, along with the relevant laws and instructions provided, in order to determine liability and assess potential damages when handling cases related to Raiding Key Employees.