Franklin Ohio Jury Instruction - 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Basic Civil Claim Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• County: Franklin
• Control #: US-11CB-7-2
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. Franklin Ohio Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue In Franklin, Ohio, the Jury Instruction 7.2 addresses the duty of jurors to deliberate when both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages or in cases where damages are not an issue. This instruction outlines the responsibilities and considerations jurors must have while deliberating on such cases. When both the plaintiff and the defendant claim damages, the jurors are tasked with carefully assessing the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. They must consider the extent and nature of the damages claimed, the evidence supporting those claims, and any relevant legal principles provided by the court. The purpose of this instruction is to emphasize that jurors have a responsibility to openly discuss and consider all claims for damages brought forth by both the plaintiff and the defendant. The jury must thoroughly evaluate the evidence and make a determination based on the merits of each party's case. Jurors must use logical reasoning and take into account the burden of proof concerning the claimed damages. They should consider the credibility of witnesses, the presence of any corroborating evidence, and any potential inconsistencies in the testimonies heard during the trial. The goal is to arrive at a fair and just verdict that aligns with the evidence presented and the applicable laws. In cases where damages are not in dispute, the jury still needs to deliberate on other aspects of the case, such as liability or fault. Although damages may not be contested, the jury should carefully review all evidence and arguments related to liability to ensure a fair outcome is reached. Different types of Franklin Ohio Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue might include: 1. Duty to Consider Comparative Fault: This instruction focuses on the duty of the jury to assess the comparative fault or negligence of each party when both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages. 2. Duty to Consider Contributory Negligence: This instruction emphasizes the jury's obligation to examine potential contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff when evaluating damages claimed by both parties. 3. Duty to Evaluate Non-economic Damages: This instruction highlights the jury's responsibility to consider non-economic damages, such as emotional distress or pain and suffering, when both parties claim damages. 4. Duty to Assess Economic Damages: This instruction directs the jury to carefully assess economic damages, including medical expenses, lost wages, or property damage, claimed by both the plaintiff and defendant. 5. Duty to Deliberate on Liability: This instruction underscores the jury's duty to deliberate and determine liability or fault in cases where damages are not in dispute. It is crucial for the jury to fully understand their duty in evaluating damages and to apply the relevant law while deliberating. By conscientiously considering the evidence and following the instructions provided by the court, the jury can ensure a fair and just resolution to the case at hand.

Franklin Ohio Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue In Franklin, Ohio, the Jury Instruction 7.2 addresses the duty of jurors to deliberate when both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages or in cases where damages are not an issue. This instruction outlines the responsibilities and considerations jurors must have while deliberating on such cases. When both the plaintiff and the defendant claim damages, the jurors are tasked with carefully assessing the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. They must consider the extent and nature of the damages claimed, the evidence supporting those claims, and any relevant legal principles provided by the court. The purpose of this instruction is to emphasize that jurors have a responsibility to openly discuss and consider all claims for damages brought forth by both the plaintiff and the defendant. The jury must thoroughly evaluate the evidence and make a determination based on the merits of each party's case. Jurors must use logical reasoning and take into account the burden of proof concerning the claimed damages. They should consider the credibility of witnesses, the presence of any corroborating evidence, and any potential inconsistencies in the testimonies heard during the trial. The goal is to arrive at a fair and just verdict that aligns with the evidence presented and the applicable laws. In cases where damages are not in dispute, the jury still needs to deliberate on other aspects of the case, such as liability or fault. Although damages may not be contested, the jury should carefully review all evidence and arguments related to liability to ensure a fair outcome is reached. Different types of Franklin Ohio Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue might include: 1. Duty to Consider Comparative Fault: This instruction focuses on the duty of the jury to assess the comparative fault or negligence of each party when both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages. 2. Duty to Consider Contributory Negligence: This instruction emphasizes the jury's obligation to examine potential contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff when evaluating damages claimed by both parties. 3. Duty to Evaluate Non-economic Damages: This instruction highlights the jury's responsibility to consider non-economic damages, such as emotional distress or pain and suffering, when both parties claim damages. 4. Duty to Assess Economic Damages: This instruction directs the jury to carefully assess economic damages, including medical expenses, lost wages, or property damage, claimed by both the plaintiff and defendant. 5. Duty to Deliberate on Liability: This instruction underscores the jury's duty to deliberate and determine liability or fault in cases where damages are not in dispute. It is crucial for the jury to fully understand their duty in evaluating damages and to apply the relevant law while deliberating. By conscientiously considering the evidence and following the instructions provided by the court, the jury can ensure a fair and just resolution to the case at hand.