Wayne Michigan Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 Race And Or Sex Discrimination Discharge — Failure To PromotIncludingin— - Same Decision Defense The Wayne Michigan Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 focuses on cases involving race and/or sex discrimination in relation to discharge and failure to promote, specifically highlighting the same decision defense. This instruction is instrumental in outlining the legal aspects and considerations associated with such claims. In cases of alleged race and/or sex discrimination leading to discharge or failure to promote in Wayne, Michigan, the jury must carefully analyze the evidence presented and consider the pertinent legal instructions provided. The instruction starts by emphasizing the importance of avoiding any form of discrimination based on race or sex. The keyword "race discrimination" refers to situations where an individual is terminated from their employment or denied a promotion due to their race. This type of discrimination is prohibited under federal and state laws, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Similarly, the keyword "sex discrimination" refers to instances where an individual faces adverse employment actions such as discharge or failure to promote solely on the basis of their gender. This type of discrimination is also prohibited under Title VII. The instruction further explains the concept of "failure to promote" by highlighting instances where an employee may have been qualified, performed well, and demonstrated potential for advancement, but was denied promotion due to race and/or sex discrimination. It stresses that employees should not face such discriminatory barriers when seeking career advancement opportunities. The instruction introduces the notion of the "same decision defense" as a potential defense strategy by the employer. This defense argues that even if there was evidence of race or sex discrimination, the ultimate decision would have been the same regardless. In other words, the employer asserts that the adverse action taken against the employee was not influenced by race or sex but rather due to non-discriminatory reasons. Different types or variations of the Wayne Michigan Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 Race And Or Sex Discrimination Discharge — Failure To PromotIncludingin— - Same Decision Defense may include variations in the level of evidence required, specific legal references for Michigan state law, or instructions tailored to different industries or sectors where race and sex discrimination claims commonly arise, such as law enforcement or healthcare. In conclusion, the Wayne Michigan Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 plays a crucial role in guiding the jury's understanding of race and/or sex discrimination cases involving discharge or failure to promote, especially by explaining the "same decision defense." It reinforces the importance of fair treatment in the workplace, promoting equality and contributing to a discrimination-free professional environment.