Hennepin Minnesota Jury Instruction — 1.3.1 Civil Rights Act 42 USC Sect.1981 Race Discrimination In Employment Discharge — Failure To Promote General Instruction is a crucial legal guideline provided to juries in Hennepin County, Minnesota during civil rights cases related to race discrimination in employment. This specific instruction focuses on situations where an employee alleges race discrimination and failure to promote resulting in discharge from their position. The instruction provides essential guidance to jurors on how to evaluate the evidence presented in such cases. It highlights the key elements that need to be proven by the plaintiff in order to establish a claim of race discrimination under the Civil Rights Act, specifically Section 1981 of Title 42 of the United States Code (42 USC Sect. 1981). Keywords: 1. Hennepin Minnesota Jury Instruction: Referring to a specific set of instructions provided to juries in Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2. Civil Rights Act: A federal law that aims to protect individuals from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. 42 USC Sect.1981: Short for Title 42 of the United States Code, Section 1981. It is a specific section of the law that addresses racial discrimination in making and enforcing contracts. 4. Race Discrimination: The act of treating someone unfairly or unfavorably due to their race. 5. Employment Discharge: The termination of an employee from their position of employment. 6. Failure To Promote General Instruction: A specific guidance provided to juries on how to evaluate cases involving failure to promote employees based on race discrimination allegations. Different types of Hennepin Minnesota Jury Instruction — 1.3.1 Civil Rights Act 42 USC Sect.1981 Race Discrimination In Employment Discharge — Failure To Promote General Instruction may include variations based on specific circumstances, such as different theories of discrimination, types of evidence to consider, burden of proof, defining key legal terms, explaining the employer's defense options, or discussing mitigating factors that might affect liability. Each case is unique, and the instructions may be tailored accordingly.