Phoenix Arizona Jury Instruction - 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 - 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Adverse Employment Action
• State: Multi-State
• City: Phoenix
• Control #: US-11CF-1-5-1
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. Phoenix Arizona Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim is a detailed instruction provided to the jury in Phoenix, Arizona, regarding a specific claim related to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This instruction guides jurors in understanding the legal principles surrounding disparate treatment claims under the ADA and assists them in making an informed decision based on the evidence presented during a trial. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in various aspects of public life, including employment, public accommodations, transportation, and more. This instruction specifically addresses disparate treatment claims, which relate to situations where an individual with a disability alleges that they have been treated less favorably compared to others without disabilities in similar circumstances. Key Content and Concepts Covered by Phoenix Arizona Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim: 1. Disparate Treatment Claim: This instruction focuses on the legal standard for proving a disparate treatment claim under the ADA. Jurors will learn that to succeed in their claim, the plaintiff must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that: — The plaintiff has a disability as defined by the ADA. — The defendant is subject to the ADA's requirements. — The plaintiff was qualified to perform the essential functions of the job or enjoy the benefits and privileges of the public accommodation. — The plaintiff was subjected to adverse treatment or suffered an adverse employment decision. — The plaintiff's disability played a significant role in the adverse treatment or decision. 2. Elements of Disparate Treatment: Jurors will be instructed on the different elements necessary to establish a prima facie case of disparate treatment under the ADA, which includes: — The plaintiff's qualification and abilities to perform the job or enjoy public accommodations. — The defendant's knowledge of the plaintiff's disability. — Evidence of less favorable treatment or adverse employment action. — A connection between the adverse treatment and the plaintiff's disability. 3. Direct and Circumstantial Evidence: The instruction explains to jurors that the plaintiff can rely on either direct evidence or circumstantial evidence to establish a disparate treatment claim. Direct evidence is explicit, while circumstantial evidence relies on inferences and the surrounding circumstances. 4. Pretext: Jurors will learn about the concept of pretext, which refers to an explanation given by the defendant that may not be the true reason for the adverse treatment. The instruction helps jurors evaluate whether the alleged reasons given by the defendant are legitimate or merely a cover for disability discrimination. Additional types or variations of Phoenix Arizona Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim may exist depending on specific legal cases and developments in ADA jurisprudence. However, the provided content covers the core elements of this jury instruction in the context of a disparate treatment claim under the ADA.

Phoenix Arizona Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim is a detailed instruction provided to the jury in Phoenix, Arizona, regarding a specific claim related to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This instruction guides jurors in understanding the legal principles surrounding disparate treatment claims under the ADA and assists them in making an informed decision based on the evidence presented during a trial. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in various aspects of public life, including employment, public accommodations, transportation, and more. This instruction specifically addresses disparate treatment claims, which relate to situations where an individual with a disability alleges that they have been treated less favorably compared to others without disabilities in similar circumstances. Key Content and Concepts Covered by Phoenix Arizona Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim: 1. Disparate Treatment Claim: This instruction focuses on the legal standard for proving a disparate treatment claim under the ADA. Jurors will learn that to succeed in their claim, the plaintiff must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that: — The plaintiff has a disability as defined by the ADA. — The defendant is subject to the ADA's requirements. — The plaintiff was qualified to perform the essential functions of the job or enjoy the benefits and privileges of the public accommodation. — The plaintiff was subjected to adverse treatment or suffered an adverse employment decision. — The plaintiff's disability played a significant role in the adverse treatment or decision. 2. Elements of Disparate Treatment: Jurors will be instructed on the different elements necessary to establish a prima facie case of disparate treatment under the ADA, which includes: — The plaintiff's qualification and abilities to perform the job or enjoy public accommodations. — The defendant's knowledge of the plaintiff's disability. — Evidence of less favorable treatment or adverse employment action. — A connection between the adverse treatment and the plaintiff's disability. 3. Direct and Circumstantial Evidence: The instruction explains to jurors that the plaintiff can rely on either direct evidence or circumstantial evidence to establish a disparate treatment claim. Direct evidence is explicit, while circumstantial evidence relies on inferences and the surrounding circumstances. 4. Pretext: Jurors will learn about the concept of pretext, which refers to an explanation given by the defendant that may not be the true reason for the adverse treatment. The instruction helps jurors evaluate whether the alleged reasons given by the defendant are legitimate or merely a cover for disability discrimination. Additional types or variations of Phoenix Arizona Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim may exist depending on specific legal cases and developments in ADA jurisprudence. However, the provided content covers the core elements of this jury instruction in the context of a disparate treatment claim under the ADA.