Santa Clara California Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim: The Santa Clara California Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 focuses on the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and addresses the Disparate Treatment Claim. The ADA, under 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117, prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in various areas, including employment, public accommodations, and government services. Disparate Treatment Claim refers to a specific type of discrimination claim under the ADA. It occurs when an employer treats a qualified individual with a disability less favorably than other employees because of their disability. This type of claim focuses on intentional discrimination based on disability. The Santa Clara California Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 for Disparate Treatment Claims under the ADA provides detailed guidance for jurors on how to evaluate and decide such cases. It ensures that the jury understands the legal framework, elements, and burden of proof required to establish a Disparate Treatment Claim. Key points addressed in the Santa Clara California Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 for Disparate Treatment Claims under the ADA may include: 1. Elements of a Disparate Treatment Claim: This instruction explains the necessary elements that the plaintiff must prove to establish a Disparate Treatment Claim. These elements typically include proving that the plaintiff has a disability, is qualified for the job/position, suffered an adverse employment action, and that the action was taken because of their disability. 2. Intentional Discrimination: The instruction emphasizes that a Disparate Treatment Claim requires proving intentional discrimination. This means the discrimination was purposeful and not merely a result of inadvertent actions or policies. 3. Prima Facie Case: Jurors are instructed on the concept of a prima facie case, which is the initial burden of proof placed on the plaintiff to establish a valid claim. Instruction may provide specific criteria that the plaintiff must meet to establish a prima facie case. 4. Burden of Proof: The instruction clarifies the burden of proof required for the plaintiff to succeed in proving their Disparate Treatment Claim. It may explain that the plaintiff has the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case, after which the burden shifts to the defendant to offer a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for their actions. The plaintiff then has the burden to prove that the offered reason is merely a pretext for discrimination. While the Santa Clara California Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 addresses Disparate Treatment Claims under the ADA, there might not necessarily be different types of such instructions. However, different versions or variations of the instruction may exist to suit specific ADA-related cases or circumstances. These variations could result from different interpretations, legal precedents, or case law developments that may necessitate minor adjustments in the instruction's language or emphasis. Overall, the Santa Clara California Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 plays a crucial role in educating jurors about the legal standards and considerations involved in deciding Disparate Treatment Claims under the Americans With Disabilities Act, ensuring fair and impartial deliberation.