Sacramento California Jury Instruction - 1.5.2 Reasonable Accommodation Claim

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Adverse Employment Action
• State: Multi-State
• County: Sacramento
• Control #: US-11CF-1-5-2
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. Sacramento California Jury Instruction — 1.5.2 Reasonable Accommodation Claim provides guidance to jurors in cases related to claims of reasonable accommodation under California law. This instruction assists jurors in understanding the legal requirements and considerations involved in deciding whether an employer has unlawfully failed to provide reasonable accommodation to an employee or job applicant with a disability. Reasonable accommodation refers to modifications or adjustments that employers are required to make in order to enable individuals with disabilities to perform their job duties or have an equal opportunity to apply and succeed in employment. These accommodations should be feasible and not cause undue hardship to the employer. By using Sacramento California Jury Instruction — 1.5.2 Reasonable Accommodation Claim, jurors are instructed on how to evaluate certain key factors, including: 1. Understanding the definition of reasonable accommodation: The instruction provides an explanation of what qualifies as a reasonable accommodation, such as job restructuring, modified work schedules, or providing assistive devices. 2. The interactive process: Jurors are instructed to consider whether the employer engaged in a good-faith interactive process with the employee or applicant to determine and implement suitable accommodations. 3. Employer's knowledge of the disability: Jurors need to assess whether the employer had actual knowledge of the employee's disability or whether the disability was known or should have been known by using appropriate methods of communication. 4. Reasonable accommodation requests: The instruction emphasizes that the employee or applicant must have made a request for accommodation, or the employer must have been aware of the need for accommodation if the disability is obvious. 5. Consideration of potential hardships: Jurors are informed that if the employer argues that providing accommodation would impose an undue hardship, they should evaluate the evidence provided by the parties. While Sacramento California Jury Instruction — 1.5.2 Reasonable Accommodation Claim provides a comprehensive overview of the general principles and factors involved in reasonable accommodation claims, it is crucial to note that the specific instructions may vary depending on the circumstances of each case. This instruction serves as a guide for jurors to ensure a fair and informed decision-making process when assessing such claims in Sacramento, California. Other types of Sacramento California Jury Instructions related to employment law issues may include discrimination claims, retaliation claims, harassment claims, wrongful termination claims, wage and hour claims, and many more. Each instruction addresses the particular legal elements and considerations associated with each type of claim to assist jurors in their deliberations.

Sacramento California Jury Instruction — 1.5.2 Reasonable Accommodation Claim provides guidance to jurors in cases related to claims of reasonable accommodation under California law. This instruction assists jurors in understanding the legal requirements and considerations involved in deciding whether an employer has unlawfully failed to provide reasonable accommodation to an employee or job applicant with a disability. Reasonable accommodation refers to modifications or adjustments that employers are required to make in order to enable individuals with disabilities to perform their job duties or have an equal opportunity to apply and succeed in employment. These accommodations should be feasible and not cause undue hardship to the employer. By using Sacramento California Jury Instruction — 1.5.2 Reasonable Accommodation Claim, jurors are instructed on how to evaluate certain key factors, including: 1. Understanding the definition of reasonable accommodation: The instruction provides an explanation of what qualifies as a reasonable accommodation, such as job restructuring, modified work schedules, or providing assistive devices. 2. The interactive process: Jurors are instructed to consider whether the employer engaged in a good-faith interactive process with the employee or applicant to determine and implement suitable accommodations. 3. Employer's knowledge of the disability: Jurors need to assess whether the employer had actual knowledge of the employee's disability or whether the disability was known or should have been known by using appropriate methods of communication. 4. Reasonable accommodation requests: The instruction emphasizes that the employee or applicant must have made a request for accommodation, or the employer must have been aware of the need for accommodation if the disability is obvious. 5. Consideration of potential hardships: Jurors are informed that if the employer argues that providing accommodation would impose an undue hardship, they should evaluate the evidence provided by the parties. While Sacramento California Jury Instruction — 1.5.2 Reasonable Accommodation Claim provides a comprehensive overview of the general principles and factors involved in reasonable accommodation claims, it is crucial to note that the specific instructions may vary depending on the circumstances of each case. This instruction serves as a guide for jurors to ensure a fair and informed decision-making process when assessing such claims in Sacramento, California. Other types of Sacramento California Jury Instructions related to employment law issues may include discrimination claims, retaliation claims, harassment claims, wrongful termination claims, wage and hour claims, and many more. Each instruction addresses the particular legal elements and considerations associated with each type of claim to assist jurors in their deliberations.