Salt Lake City, Utah Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1 describes the per se violation of conspiracy to fix prices, including an alternative rule of reason instruction. This jury instruction is relevant in cases where individuals or companies are accused of engaging in an illegal conspiracy to manipulate prices in the market. In such cases, the prosecution must prove that the defendants conspired together to fix prices, which means that they agreed to set prices at a certain level regardless of market conditions or competition. This type of behavior is considered illegal and is subject to penalties under the law. The Salt Lake City, Utah Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1 aims to guide the jury in understanding the legal elements of a per se violation of conspiracy to fix prices and the available defenses. It provides a detailed explanation of the elements that must be proven, the burden of proof, and the potential consequences of a violation. The instruction also includes an alternative rule of reason instruction, which allows the defendant to present evidence demonstrating that their actions were reasonable and did not harm competition in the market. This defense asserts that the price-fixing agreement had pro-competitive effects and outweighed any potential anticompetitive consequences. It is important to note that there may be variations of the Salt Lake City, Utah Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1, Per Se Violation Conspiracy To Fix Prices — Includes Alternative Rule of Reason Instruction depending on the specific jurisdiction or court. Different versions of jury instructions may have slight differences in language or emphasis, but they generally serve the same purpose of providing guidance to the jury. In summary, the Salt Lake City, Utah Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1, Per Se Violation Conspiracy To Fix Prices — Includes Alternative Rule of Reason Instruction is a crucial tool for ensuring a fair and just trial in cases involving allegations of price-fixing conspiracies. It outlines the legal elements, burden of proof, and potential defenses, including the alternative rule of reason defense.