This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
Alameda California Jury Instruction — 9.9.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Including Partial Taking Instructions is a set of instructions provided to the jury during a trial in Alameda County, California. These instructions specifically address cases involving partial taking, where a government entity acquires only a portion of a property for public use through eminent domain. In cases of partial taking, the property owner is entitled to receive just compensation for the portion taken, as well as any damages caused to the remaining property. The jury instruction 9.9.1 provides guidance to the jury in determining the appropriate amount of compensation to be awarded to the property owner. The instruction consists of several key elements that the jury needs to consider when calculating compensation. These elements include the fair market value of the property taken, the reduction in value of the remaining property, severance damages (if any), and any special benefits resulting from the public project for which the partial taking is made. The fair market value of the property taken refers to the amount that a willing buyer would pay to a willing seller, considering all relevant factors at the time of the taking. This value serves as the baseline for determining the compensation. The reduction in value of the remaining property accounts for any decrease in value caused by the partial taking. For example, if the partial taking affects the accessibility, visibility, or usefulness of the remaining property, it may result in a decrease in its overall value. Severance damages, if applicable, refer to any damages suffered by the remaining property due to the partial taking. These damages may include increased maintenance costs, loss of privacy, or interference with existing improvements on the property. Lastly, any special benefits resulting from the public project for which the taking is made need to be considered. For instance, if the partial taking creates new infrastructure or amenities that enhance the value of the remaining property, these benefits may offset some compensation to be awarded. It is important to note that there may be variations or additional instructions specific to different types of partial takings in Alameda County. For instance, there might be separate instructions for cases involving residential properties, commercial properties, or vacant lands. These specialized instructions would provide more detailed guidance tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. In summary, Alameda California Jury Instruction — 9.9.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Including Partial Taking Instructions provides the jury with guidelines for determining just compensation in cases involving partial takings in Alameda County. Through careful consideration of factors such as fair market value, reduction in value of remaining property, severance damages, and special benefits, the jury aims to provide a fair and equitable outcome for both the property owner and the government entity involved.
Alameda California Jury Instruction — 9.9.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Including Partial Taking Instructions is a set of instructions provided to the jury during a trial in Alameda County, California. These instructions specifically address cases involving partial taking, where a government entity acquires only a portion of a property for public use through eminent domain. In cases of partial taking, the property owner is entitled to receive just compensation for the portion taken, as well as any damages caused to the remaining property. The jury instruction 9.9.1 provides guidance to the jury in determining the appropriate amount of compensation to be awarded to the property owner. The instruction consists of several key elements that the jury needs to consider when calculating compensation. These elements include the fair market value of the property taken, the reduction in value of the remaining property, severance damages (if any), and any special benefits resulting from the public project for which the partial taking is made. The fair market value of the property taken refers to the amount that a willing buyer would pay to a willing seller, considering all relevant factors at the time of the taking. This value serves as the baseline for determining the compensation. The reduction in value of the remaining property accounts for any decrease in value caused by the partial taking. For example, if the partial taking affects the accessibility, visibility, or usefulness of the remaining property, it may result in a decrease in its overall value. Severance damages, if applicable, refer to any damages suffered by the remaining property due to the partial taking. These damages may include increased maintenance costs, loss of privacy, or interference with existing improvements on the property. Lastly, any special benefits resulting from the public project for which the taking is made need to be considered. For instance, if the partial taking creates new infrastructure or amenities that enhance the value of the remaining property, these benefits may offset some compensation to be awarded. It is important to note that there may be variations or additional instructions specific to different types of partial takings in Alameda County. For instance, there might be separate instructions for cases involving residential properties, commercial properties, or vacant lands. These specialized instructions would provide more detailed guidance tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. In summary, Alameda California Jury Instruction — 9.9.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Including Partial Taking Instructions provides the jury with guidelines for determining just compensation in cases involving partial takings in Alameda County. Through careful consideration of factors such as fair market value, reduction in value of remaining property, severance damages, and special benefits, the jury aims to provide a fair and equitable outcome for both the property owner and the government entity involved.