Houston is the fourth-largest city in the United States, located in the state of Texas. In criminal trials held within the city, jurors are provided with specific instructions known as Houston Texas Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statement and Felony Conviction — Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction, to guide them in evaluating witness testimony and determining the credibility of the defendant. Impeachment is a legal term that refers to the act of challenging the credibility of a witness's testimony. In this particular jury instruction, two key elements are at play: inconsistent statements and felony conviction. If the defendant testifies in court and has no felony conviction, it becomes crucial to examine any inconsistent statements they may have made. The purpose of this jury instruction is to inform the jurors that they should consider the defendant's inconsistent statements when determining how much weight they should give to the defendant's testimony. The fact that the defendant has no prior felony conviction may make their testimony more believable. However, if inconsistencies arise within their statements, the jury is urged to evaluate the credibility of the defendant's testimony as a result. Different types of Houston Texas Jury Instruction — Impeachment — Inconsistent Statement and Felony Conviction — Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction may include: 1. Standard Instruction: The standard instruction provides a general guideline to the jurors about considering inconsistent statements made by the defendant without a prior felony conviction when weighing their testimony. Jurors are advised to carefully evaluate any inconsistencies and weigh them against the defendant's overall credibility. 2. Specific Instruction: A specific instruction can be given when there are particular inconsistencies in the defendant's statements that require closer examination. This instruction may highlight specific inconsistencies and guide the jury on how to evaluate the impact of those inconsistencies on the defendant's credibility. 3. Expert Witness Testimony Instruction: If expert witnesses are involved and their testimony contradicts the defendant's statements, a specific instruction may be given to guide jurors on how to assess the credibility of both the expert witness and the defendant. This instruction emphasizes the importance of expert testimonies and their potential impact on the defendant's credibility. In summary, Houston Texas Jury Instruction — Impeachment — Inconsistent Statement and Felony Conviction — Defendant Testifies With No Felony Conviction provides jurors with guidance on evaluating the credibility of a defendant's testimony. By considering any inconsistencies in the defendant's statements while also acknowledging the absence of prior felony conviction, the jury can make an informed decision in a criminal trial held in Houston, Texas.