Title: Fulton Georgia Jury Instruction — Assaulting A Federal Office— - Without Use Of A Deadly Weapon Keywords: Fulton Georgia, jury instruction, assaulting a federal officer, without use of a deadly weapon Description: The Fulton Georgia jury instruction for assaulting a federal officer without use of a deadly weapon provides comprehensive guidelines for understanding the legal framework and elements required to establish this offense. Charged with protecting federal personnel from harm, these instructions ensure that the jury is well-informed about the nature and implications of assaulting a federal officer without involving a deadly weapon. Types of Fulton Georgia Jury Instruction — Assaulting A Federal Office— - Without Use Of A Deadly Weapon: 1. Definition of Assaulting a Federal Officer: This jury instruction clarifies the legal definition of assault, emphasizing the act of intentionally causing apprehension of immediate, offensive physical contact with a federal officer, without the use of a deadly weapon. 2. Identifying a Federal Officer: This instruction helps jurors identify who qualifies as a federal officer, highlighting positions such as government officials, law enforcement officers, and other federal agents who perform official duties in the United States. 3. Elements Required to Establish Guilt: These instructions outline the essential elements the prosecution needs to prove to establish guilt. They typically include establishing that: — The victim was a federal officer working within their official capacity. — The defendant intentionally and unlawfully engaged in an act that caused apprehension of immediate, offensive physical contact. — The defendant did not use a deadly weapon in the assault. 4. Clarification of "Without Use Of A Deadly Weapon": This instruction elaborates on the scope of "deadly weapon," defining it as any object capable of causing serious bodily harm or death. It ensures that jurors understand the distinction between assaults without a deadly weapon and those involving one. 5. Evaluation of Intent and Men REA: Jurors are instructed to consider the intent and mental state of the defendant at the time of the assault. Should the prosecution prove that the defendant acted intentionally, without legal justification, the jury may find them guilty of violating this offense. 6. Elements of Self-Defense: These instructions discuss permissible self-defense claims. If the defendant believed they faced a threat of immediate, serious bodily harm and their response was reasonable given the circumstances, this instruction outlines that their actions may not constitute assault. 7. Jury Deliberation: This instruction guides the jurors on the process of deliberation, emphasizing that they should examine all the evidence presented and unanimously agree on a verdict beyond a reasonable doubt. By providing these clear and comprehensive jury instructions, the Fulton Georgia court ensures that jurors can make informed decisions based on the evidence presented while understanding the specific elements and implications of assaulting a federal officer without using a deadly weapon.