San Bernardino California Jury Instruction — False Impersonation Of An Officer Of The United States: False impersonation of an officer of the United States is a criminal offense in San Bernardino, California. This jury instruction provides an overview of the elements and requirements for a conviction in such cases. The instruction is designed to guide the members of the jury in understanding the specific laws and regulations surrounding false impersonation of a federal officer. 1. Definition of false impersonation of an officer of the United States: False impersonation of an officer of the United States refers to the act of falsely representing oneself as an officer or employee of a federal agency, with the intent to deceive or defraud another person. The defendant must have knowingly and willfully pretended to be an officer or employee of the United States government. 2. Elements of the offense: a. The defendant knowingly and willfully pretended to be an officer or employee of a federal agency. b. The defendant did so with the specific intent to deceive or defraud another person. c. The false impersonation occurred within the jurisdiction of San Bernardino, California. 3. Proof of false impersonation: a. Show evidence that the defendant intentionally assumed a false identity as an officer of the United States. b. Provide witness testimonies or surveillance footage indicating the defendant's actions, statements, or attire supporting the false impersonation. 4. Intent to deceive or defraud: a. The prosecution should establish that the defendant had the specific intent to deceive or defraud someone by impersonating a federal officer. b. Supporting evidence such as victim testimonies, communication records, or the defendant's prior history may be presented. Types of San Bernardino California Jury Instruction — False Impersonation Of An Officer Of The United States: 1. False impersonation during a federal investigation: This type refers to cases where the defendant impersonates a federal officer during an ongoing federal investigation. It often involves attempts to hinder the investigation, gain unlawful access to confidential information, or solicit bribes using the false identity. 2. False impersonation for financial gain: This category involves cases where the defendant falsely represents themselves as a federal officer with the intention of obtaining financial benefits, such as acting as a fraudulent tax collector or requesting payment for government services they are not authorized to provide. 3. False impersonation in official capacity: These cases involve individuals assuming a false identity as a federal officer to exert authority or influence over others. Examples include falsely claiming to be an immigration officer or a federal law enforcement agent to intimidate or coerce individuals. It is essential for the jury to carefully consider the evidence presented by both the prosecution and defense in order to make an informed decision regarding the guilt or innocence of the defendant in a false impersonation of an officer of the United States case in San Bernardino, California.