Kings New York Jury Instruction - Wire Fraud - Depriving Another Of Intangible Right Of Honest Services

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Offenses Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• County: Kings
• Control #: US-11CRO-42-2
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. Kings New York Jury Instruction — Wire Frau— - Depriving Another Of Intangible Right Of Honest Services is a legal guideline provided to the jury in cases involving wire fraud that deprives another of the intangible right of honest services. Wire fraud involves the use of electronic communications to execute a scheme to defraud someone of money or property. When it comes to this specific jury instruction, there may be various types or aspects to consider, including: 1. Elements of Wire Fraud: This instruction will outline the essential elements that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in the jury to find the defendant guilty of wire fraud. These elements typically include the existence of a fraudulent scheme, intent to defraud, use of interstate wire communications, and deprivation of honest services. 2. Scheme to Deprive of Intangible Right of Honest Services: This instruction will explain what constitutes a scheme to defraud the victim of their intangible right of honest services. It may include examples of actions or behaviors that qualify as such schemes, such as bribery, kickbacks, or undisclosed conflicts of interest. 3. Interstate Wire Communication: This instruction will clarify the requirement that the fraudulent scheme must involve the use of interstate wire communications, such as phone calls, emails, or electronic transfers. It may also specify what forms of electronic communication fall under this jurisdiction. 4. Evidence: This instruction will guide the jury on considering the different types of evidence that can be presented during a trial, such as witness testimony, documents, financial records, or other electronic communications. It will emphasize the importance of evaluating the credibility and relevance of the evidence. 5. Reasonable Doubt: This instruction will highlight the burden of proof on the prosecution, emphasizing that the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It will explain the concept of reasonable doubt to ensure the jury makes an informed decision. 6. Jury Deliberation: This instruction will outline the process and responsibilities of the jury during deliberation. It may include instructions on how to weigh the evidence, engage in constructive discussions, and come to a fair and unanimous verdict. Overall, Kings New York Jury Instruction — Wire Frau— - Depriving Another Of Intangible Right Of Honest Services provides the jury with a comprehensive understanding of the relevant legal principles and elements to consider when determining guilt or innocence in cases involving wire fraud and the deprivation of honest services.

Kings New York Jury Instruction — Wire Frau— - Depriving Another Of Intangible Right Of Honest Services is a legal guideline provided to the jury in cases involving wire fraud that deprives another of the intangible right of honest services. Wire fraud involves the use of electronic communications to execute a scheme to defraud someone of money or property. When it comes to this specific jury instruction, there may be various types or aspects to consider, including: 1. Elements of Wire Fraud: This instruction will outline the essential elements that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in the jury to find the defendant guilty of wire fraud. These elements typically include the existence of a fraudulent scheme, intent to defraud, use of interstate wire communications, and deprivation of honest services. 2. Scheme to Deprive of Intangible Right of Honest Services: This instruction will explain what constitutes a scheme to defraud the victim of their intangible right of honest services. It may include examples of actions or behaviors that qualify as such schemes, such as bribery, kickbacks, or undisclosed conflicts of interest. 3. Interstate Wire Communication: This instruction will clarify the requirement that the fraudulent scheme must involve the use of interstate wire communications, such as phone calls, emails, or electronic transfers. It may also specify what forms of electronic communication fall under this jurisdiction. 4. Evidence: This instruction will guide the jury on considering the different types of evidence that can be presented during a trial, such as witness testimony, documents, financial records, or other electronic communications. It will emphasize the importance of evaluating the credibility and relevance of the evidence. 5. Reasonable Doubt: This instruction will highlight the burden of proof on the prosecution, emphasizing that the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It will explain the concept of reasonable doubt to ensure the jury makes an informed decision. 6. Jury Deliberation: This instruction will outline the process and responsibilities of the jury during deliberation. It may include instructions on how to weigh the evidence, engage in constructive discussions, and come to a fair and unanimous verdict. Overall, Kings New York Jury Instruction — Wire Frau— - Depriving Another Of Intangible Right Of Honest Services provides the jury with a comprehensive understanding of the relevant legal principles and elements to consider when determining guilt or innocence in cases involving wire fraud and the deprivation of honest services.