This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
Orange California Jury Instruction — Wire Frau— - Depriving Another Of Intangible Right Of Honest Services is a legal instruction specifically related to wire fraud cases in the state of California, particularly Orange County. Wire fraud refers to any fraudulent scheme or activity that involves the use of electronic communication, such as phone calls, emails, or electronic transactions, to deceive others and obtain money or property through false pretenses. The focus of this particular jury instruction is on wire fraud cases that involve depriving another person of their intangible right to honest services. This means that the defendant, through the use of wire communication, intentionally and knowingly deprived another person of their right to an honest and unbiased service or relationship, resulting in the victim suffering financial loss or harm. Some examples of wire fraud cases that may fall under the Orange County Jury Instruction — Wire Frau— - Depriving Another Of Intangible Right Of Honest Services include: 1. Bribery: When a defendant offers or accepts a bribe via wire communication to influence someone, such as a public official or corporate executive, to act dishonestly in their official capacity. 2. Embezzlement: When an employee misappropriates funds or properties entrusted to them, using wire communication to hide the fraudulent activity and deceive their employer or clients. 3. Ponzi schemes: Wire communication is often utilized to promote fraudulent investment schemes, where the defendant promises high returns to investors but actually pays those returns using funds from subsequent investors rather than through legitimate business activities. 4. Kickbacks or illegal gratuities: Wire fraud can occur when a defendant receives or gives illegal kickbacks or gratuities by using wire communication to establish and maintain an unfair business transaction or relationship. 5. Political corruption: This type of wire fraud case involves public officials using wire communication to engage in corrupt activities, such as accepting bribes or kickbacks in exchange for granting favors or making biased decisions. In conclusion, Orange California Jury Instruction — Wire Frau— - Depriving Another Of Intangible Right Of Honest Services is a legal instruction specialized for wire fraud cases in the Orange County region. It addresses cases where wire communication is used to deceive others and deprive them of their intangible right to honest services, resulting in financial loss or harm. Various types of wire fraud cases, such as bribery, embezzlement, Ponzi schemes, kickbacks, and political corruption, can be included under this instruction.
Orange California Jury Instruction — Wire Frau— - Depriving Another Of Intangible Right Of Honest Services is a legal instruction specifically related to wire fraud cases in the state of California, particularly Orange County. Wire fraud refers to any fraudulent scheme or activity that involves the use of electronic communication, such as phone calls, emails, or electronic transactions, to deceive others and obtain money or property through false pretenses. The focus of this particular jury instruction is on wire fraud cases that involve depriving another person of their intangible right to honest services. This means that the defendant, through the use of wire communication, intentionally and knowingly deprived another person of their right to an honest and unbiased service or relationship, resulting in the victim suffering financial loss or harm. Some examples of wire fraud cases that may fall under the Orange County Jury Instruction — Wire Frau— - Depriving Another Of Intangible Right Of Honest Services include: 1. Bribery: When a defendant offers or accepts a bribe via wire communication to influence someone, such as a public official or corporate executive, to act dishonestly in their official capacity. 2. Embezzlement: When an employee misappropriates funds or properties entrusted to them, using wire communication to hide the fraudulent activity and deceive their employer or clients. 3. Ponzi schemes: Wire communication is often utilized to promote fraudulent investment schemes, where the defendant promises high returns to investors but actually pays those returns using funds from subsequent investors rather than through legitimate business activities. 4. Kickbacks or illegal gratuities: Wire fraud can occur when a defendant receives or gives illegal kickbacks or gratuities by using wire communication to establish and maintain an unfair business transaction or relationship. 5. Political corruption: This type of wire fraud case involves public officials using wire communication to engage in corrupt activities, such as accepting bribes or kickbacks in exchange for granting favors or making biased decisions. In conclusion, Orange California Jury Instruction — Wire Frau— - Depriving Another Of Intangible Right Of Honest Services is a legal instruction specialized for wire fraud cases in the Orange County region. It addresses cases where wire communication is used to deceive others and deprive them of their intangible right to honest services, resulting in financial loss or harm. Various types of wire fraud cases, such as bribery, embezzlement, Ponzi schemes, kickbacks, and political corruption, can be included under this instruction.