Chicago Illinois Jury Instruction - Bank Robbery - Subsection (a) Only

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Offenses Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• City: Chicago
• Control #: US-11CRO-62-1
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. Chicago Illinois Jury Instruction — Bank Robber— - Subsection (a) Only is a specific legal guideline provided to jurors in Chicago, Illinois when deliberating a bank robbery case. This instruction focuses on the prosecution's burden of proof for a specific subsection of the bank robbery law. In Chicago, Illinois, the Jury Instruction for Bank Robbery — Subsection (a) Only primarily addresses the first element of the offense, which involves the intent of the defendant. This subsection establishes that to convict a defendant of bank robbery, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that: 1. The defendant knowingly took, by force, violence, intimidation, or threat, money belonging to or in the care, custody, control, management, or possession of a bank; 2. The money taken has a value exceeding $1,000; and 3. The defendant had the intent to permanently deprive the bank of its possession, use, or benefit from the money. It is essential for the prosecutor to convince the jury that the defendant committed the act of taking, using force, violence, intimidation, or threat, which caused fear or apprehension in the bank employees or customers. The instruction clarifies that the prosecution has the burden to prove the defendant's intent to permanently deprive the bank of its money by providing evidence showing their state of mind during the robbery. There may be variations or additional subsections related to bank robbery instructions, such as Subsection (b), which might involve different elements or circumstances that the jurors should consider. However, this specific content focuses solely on Subsection (a) of the bank robbery law under the Chicago Illinois Jury Instruction. Jurors must carefully evaluate the evidence presented in court and weigh it against the legal standards provided in this instruction. It is crucial that they determine the defendant's guilt or innocence based on the proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Chicago Illinois Jury Instruction — Bank Robber— - Subsection (a) Only is a specific legal guideline provided to jurors in Chicago, Illinois when deliberating a bank robbery case. This instruction focuses on the prosecution's burden of proof for a specific subsection of the bank robbery law. In Chicago, Illinois, the Jury Instruction for Bank Robbery — Subsection (a) Only primarily addresses the first element of the offense, which involves the intent of the defendant. This subsection establishes that to convict a defendant of bank robbery, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that: 1. The defendant knowingly took, by force, violence, intimidation, or threat, money belonging to or in the care, custody, control, management, or possession of a bank; 2. The money taken has a value exceeding $1,000; and 3. The defendant had the intent to permanently deprive the bank of its possession, use, or benefit from the money. It is essential for the prosecutor to convince the jury that the defendant committed the act of taking, using force, violence, intimidation, or threat, which caused fear or apprehension in the bank employees or customers. The instruction clarifies that the prosecution has the burden to prove the defendant's intent to permanently deprive the bank of its money by providing evidence showing their state of mind during the robbery. There may be variations or additional subsections related to bank robbery instructions, such as Subsection (b), which might involve different elements or circumstances that the jurors should consider. However, this specific content focuses solely on Subsection (a) of the bank robbery law under the Chicago Illinois Jury Instruction. Jurors must carefully evaluate the evidence presented in court and weigh it against the legal standards provided in this instruction. It is crucial that they determine the defendant's guilt or innocence based on the proof beyond a reasonable doubt.