Houston Texas Jury Instruction — Bank Robber— - Subsection (e) Only - Alleged In Separate Count: In Houston, Texas, there are specific instructions provided to the jury when presented with a bank robbery case. One such instruction is related to subsection (e) of the Bank Robbery statute when the alleged act is presented as a separate count. This specific instruction guides the jury on how to evaluate the evidence and consider the elements of the offense. Bank robbery cases under subsection (e) often involve situations where the defendant is charged separately for an alleged act related to a bank robbery. These acts can include additional criminal charges such as possession of a weapon during the robbery, assault on bank employees, or other related offenses. The jury must carefully consider the evidence presented in court and determine if the prosecution has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the bank robbery offense alleged in the separate count. They need to understand the specific elements of the alleged offense and evaluate whether each element has been sufficiently established through the evidence presented during the trial. The Houston Texas Jury Instruction for Bank Robbery — SubsectionDonnanl— - Alleged In Separate Count instructs the jury to consider the following elements or factors when deciding on the guilty verdict: 1. Identification: The jury needs to evaluate the identification evidence provided by the prosecution. This may include witness testimony, surveillance footage, or any other evidence linking the defendant to the alleged bank robbery. 2. Intent: The jury must determine whether there is sufficient evidence to establish that the defendant had the specific intent to commit the bank robbery alleged in the separate count. 3. Knowledge: The jury must assess whether the defendant had knowledge of the alleged crime in question. This element is crucial in determining whether the accused intentionally participated in the bank robbery act. 4. Presence at the Scene: The jury must consider evidence related to the presence of the defendant at the scene of the alleged bank robbery. This could include eyewitness testimonies, physical evidence, or any other indication that the defendant was present during the commission of the crime. Overall, the Houston Texas Jury Instruction for Bank Robbery — SubsectionDonnanl— - Alleged In Separate Count ensures that the jury understands the specific elements in order to reach a fair and just verdict. It allows them to evaluate the evidence in a structured manner and determine whether the prosecution has proved the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Different types or variations of this jury instruction may arise depending on the specific circumstances of the bank robbery case and the alleged acts presented in separate counts. For example: 1. Bank Robbery with Possession of a Weapon — SubsectionDonnanl— - Alleged In Separate Count: This instruction would guide the jury when considering additional charges of possessing a weapon during the bank robbery. 2. Bank Robbery with Assault — SubsectionDonnanl— - Alleged In Separate Count: This instruction would come into play if the defendant is separately charged with assaulting individuals during the bank robbery. These are just a few examples, as the specific variations of the Houston Texas Jury Instruction for Bank Robbery — Subsection (e) Only can differ based on the unique combination of alleged offenses involved in the separate counts.