Dallas Texas Jury Instruction — Character Evidence is a set of legal guidelines provided to the jury during a trial in Dallas, Texas, regarding the use and implications of character evidence in the evaluation of a case. Character evidence refers to evidence that pertains to the general moral character or disposition of a person involved in the legal proceedings. This instruction serves to inform the jury about the limited role such evidence should play in their decision-making process. There are several types of Dallas Texas Jury Instruction — Character Evidence, including: 1. Jury Instruction — Character Evidence – Defendant's Good Character: This instruction explains to the jury that evidence of the defendant's good character can be considered as a factor in their evaluation of the case. It highlights that good character evidence can create reasonable doubt if it outweighs the evidence against the defendant. 2. Jury Instruction — Character Evidence – Defendant's Bad Character: This instruction outlines that evidence of the defendant's bad character or prior bad acts is generally not admissible. It emphasizes that the jury should not consider this evidence as proof of guilt or a propensity to commit the alleged crime. 3. Jury Instruction — Character Evidence – Defendant's Character for Truthfulness: This instruction informs the jury that the defendant's character for truthfulness can be considered when assessing their credibility as a witness. It explains that evidence of the defendant's character for truthfulness can impact the weight given to their testimony. 4. Jury Instruction — Character Evidence – Victim's Character: This instruction educates the jury on the limited circumstances under which evidence of the victim's character can be introduced. It emphasizes that such evidence should only be used to challenge the victim's credibility and not to suggest they deserved or provoked the alleged crime. 5. Jury Instruction — Character Evidence – Defendant's Reputation: This instruction guides the jury on how to evaluate evidence of the defendant's reputation presented by witnesses. It explains that reputation evidence should only be considered in conjunction with other evidence and not as an independent basis for determining guilt or innocence. It is crucial for the jury to understand these instructions to ensure a fair and impartial assessment of the evidence presented at trial. By following these guidelines, the jury can focus on the relevant facts and merits of the case, rather than being swayed by potentially prejudicial character evidence.