Salt Lake Utah Jury Instruction - Entrapment

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Special Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• County: Salt Lake
• Control #: US-11CRS-12-1
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. Salt Lake Utah Jury Instruction Entrapmentnt is a legal defense in criminal law that occurs when law enforcement officers or government agents induce someone to commit a crime that they would not have otherwise committed. In Salt Lake City, Utah, the jury is provided with specific instructions regarding entrapment when it arises as a defense in a criminal case. These jury instructions are crucial for ensuring a fair and just trial. 1. Definition of Entrapment in Salt Lake Utah: The Salt Lake Utah Jury Instruction defines entrapment as the act of government agents or law enforcement officers using coercion, persuasion, or other improper methods to induce an individual to commit a crime they would not have committed voluntarily. 2. Two Types of Entrapment Instructions: There are two commonly used types of instructions related to entrapment that a Salt Lake City jury may receive: a. Objective Test Instruction: Under the objective test instruction, the jury is instructed to determine if the government's involvement crossed the line between a legitimate investigation and unlawful entrapment. The jury considers whether a reasonable person, under similar circumstances, would have been induced to commit the crime. b. Subjective Test Instruction: The subjective test instruction focuses on the defendant's predisposition to commit the crime. The jury must determine if the defendant was already inclined or predisposed to commit the offense, even if the government agent provided an opportunity. 3. Elements for Applying Entrapment Defense: During the trial in Salt Lake City, jurors are asked to consider the following elements when evaluating an entrapment defense: a. Government Inducement: The defendant must demonstrate that the government initiated and actively encouraged the criminal conduct. b. Absence of Predisposition: The defendant needs to show that they lacked any previous inclination or intent to commit the offense, and that they only committed it due to the government's inducement. 4. Burden of Proof for the Defendant: In Salt Lake Utah, the burden of proof lies with the defendant to establish entrapment by a preponderance of the evidence. If the defendant successfully proves entrapment, they may be found not guilty. 5. Effect of Entrapment Finding: If the jury finds that entrapment occurred and the defendant is acquitted, it prevents the government from punishing the defendant for their actions. It aims to deter law enforcement officers from enticing or trapping individuals into committing crimes they were not predisposed to commit. In conclusion, the Salt Lake Utah Jury Instruction — Entrapment provides guidance for jurors in determining whether entrapment has occurred. It outlines the definitions, tests, elements, burdens of proof, and potential effects of an entrapment defense during a criminal trial in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Salt Lake Utah Jury Instruction Entrapmentnt is a legal defense in criminal law that occurs when law enforcement officers or government agents induce someone to commit a crime that they would not have otherwise committed. In Salt Lake City, Utah, the jury is provided with specific instructions regarding entrapment when it arises as a defense in a criminal case. These jury instructions are crucial for ensuring a fair and just trial. 1. Definition of Entrapment in Salt Lake Utah: The Salt Lake Utah Jury Instruction defines entrapment as the act of government agents or law enforcement officers using coercion, persuasion, or other improper methods to induce an individual to commit a crime they would not have committed voluntarily. 2. Two Types of Entrapment Instructions: There are two commonly used types of instructions related to entrapment that a Salt Lake City jury may receive: a. Objective Test Instruction: Under the objective test instruction, the jury is instructed to determine if the government's involvement crossed the line between a legitimate investigation and unlawful entrapment. The jury considers whether a reasonable person, under similar circumstances, would have been induced to commit the crime. b. Subjective Test Instruction: The subjective test instruction focuses on the defendant's predisposition to commit the crime. The jury must determine if the defendant was already inclined or predisposed to commit the offense, even if the government agent provided an opportunity. 3. Elements for Applying Entrapment Defense: During the trial in Salt Lake City, jurors are asked to consider the following elements when evaluating an entrapment defense: a. Government Inducement: The defendant must demonstrate that the government initiated and actively encouraged the criminal conduct. b. Absence of Predisposition: The defendant needs to show that they lacked any previous inclination or intent to commit the offense, and that they only committed it due to the government's inducement. 4. Burden of Proof for the Defendant: In Salt Lake Utah, the burden of proof lies with the defendant to establish entrapment by a preponderance of the evidence. If the defendant successfully proves entrapment, they may be found not guilty. 5. Effect of Entrapment Finding: If the jury finds that entrapment occurred and the defendant is acquitted, it prevents the government from punishing the defendant for their actions. It aims to deter law enforcement officers from enticing or trapping individuals into committing crimes they were not predisposed to commit. In conclusion, the Salt Lake Utah Jury Instruction — Entrapment provides guidance for jurors in determining whether entrapment has occurred. It outlines the definitions, tests, elements, burdens of proof, and potential effects of an entrapment defense during a criminal trial in Salt Lake City, Utah.