Queens New York Jury Instruction - Modified Allen Charge

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Trial Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• County: Queens
• Control #: US-11CRT-6
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form is a model for an Allen Charge, a statement made to the jury by the Judge when the jury is reporting problems reaching an agreement on a verdict. The text is annotated with cases approving the use of the Allen Charge. Queens New York Jury Instruction — Modified Allen Charge is a crucial aspect of legal proceedings that takes place during jury deliberations. This instruction, also known as an "Allen Charge," is given to jurors when they are deadlocked or experiencing difficulty reaching a unanimous verdict. It aims to motivate and encourage jurors to continue deliberating with an open mind, while also respecting each other's opinions. The Modified Allen Charge used in Queens, New York may vary in wording but generally includes the following key elements: 1. Reiteration of the importance of unanimity: The instruction emphasizes that the judicial system greatly values unanimous decisions and highlights the significance of reaching a collective verdict. 2. Encouragement to consider opposing viewpoints: Jurors are reminded to listen attentively, appreciate the perspectives of others, and genuinely consider their arguments and evidence before finalizing their own position. 3. Reminder not to surrender honestly held beliefs: Jurors are informed that they should not abandon their honest opinions solely to agree with the majority. Their ultimate duty is to be fair and reach a verdict they truly believe is just. 4. Suggestion to reassess individual views: The instruction urges jurors to reassess their own positions by re-evaluating the evidence in light of the discussions that have taken place during deliberations. 5. Patience and respect for the process: Jurors are advised to engage in respectful and patient discussions, acknowledging that reaching a unanimous verdict can take time and effort. 6. Discouragement of arbitrary decisions: It is emphasized that jurors should not change their opinion simply to expedite the process or due to external pressures, emphasizing the importance of genuine deliberation. 7. Feedback regarding deadlock: The instruction may also request the jury to indicate the specific issues they find themselves deadlocked on, to provide additional clarity for further discussions. Different variations or names for the Modified Allen Charge used in Queens, New York might include Modified Allen Instruction, Allen's Charge to Jury, Jury Instruction to Break Impasse, or Allen's Preservation Instruction. In conclusion, the Queens New York Jury Instruction — Modified Allen Charge aims to guide and motivate jurors during deadlock situations and encourage thoughtful and collaborative deliberations until a unanimous decision is reached. This instruction highlights the importance of fair and open-minded discussions while respecting each juror's honest beliefs.

Queens New York Jury Instruction — Modified Allen Charge is a crucial aspect of legal proceedings that takes place during jury deliberations. This instruction, also known as an "Allen Charge," is given to jurors when they are deadlocked or experiencing difficulty reaching a unanimous verdict. It aims to motivate and encourage jurors to continue deliberating with an open mind, while also respecting each other's opinions. The Modified Allen Charge used in Queens, New York may vary in wording but generally includes the following key elements: 1. Reiteration of the importance of unanimity: The instruction emphasizes that the judicial system greatly values unanimous decisions and highlights the significance of reaching a collective verdict. 2. Encouragement to consider opposing viewpoints: Jurors are reminded to listen attentively, appreciate the perspectives of others, and genuinely consider their arguments and evidence before finalizing their own position. 3. Reminder not to surrender honestly held beliefs: Jurors are informed that they should not abandon their honest opinions solely to agree with the majority. Their ultimate duty is to be fair and reach a verdict they truly believe is just. 4. Suggestion to reassess individual views: The instruction urges jurors to reassess their own positions by re-evaluating the evidence in light of the discussions that have taken place during deliberations. 5. Patience and respect for the process: Jurors are advised to engage in respectful and patient discussions, acknowledging that reaching a unanimous verdict can take time and effort. 6. Discouragement of arbitrary decisions: It is emphasized that jurors should not change their opinion simply to expedite the process or due to external pressures, emphasizing the importance of genuine deliberation. 7. Feedback regarding deadlock: The instruction may also request the jury to indicate the specific issues they find themselves deadlocked on, to provide additional clarity for further discussions. Different variations or names for the Modified Allen Charge used in Queens, New York might include Modified Allen Instruction, Allen's Charge to Jury, Jury Instruction to Break Impasse, or Allen's Preservation Instruction. In conclusion, the Queens New York Jury Instruction — Modified Allen Charge aims to guide and motivate jurors during deadlock situations and encourage thoughtful and collaborative deliberations until a unanimous decision is reached. This instruction highlights the importance of fair and open-minded discussions while respecting each juror's honest beliefs.