Dallas Texas Voting Agreement between Clearworks Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevan Casey regarding sale of outstanding common stock

• Category: Corporations - Public - Voting Agreements
• State: Multi-State
• County: Dallas
• Control #: US-EG-9290
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

Voting Agreement between Clearworks Integration Services, Inc., United Computing Group, Inc., United Consulting Group, Inc. and Kevan Casey regarding sale of outstanding common stock dated December 30, 1999. 5 pages. Dallas Texas Voting Agreement is a legally binding contract entered into by Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey regarding the sale of outstanding common stock. This agreement outlines the terms and conditions under which the parties will vote their shares in order to facilitate the sale of the stock. Keywords: Dallas Texas, Voting Agreement, Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, Kevin Casey, sale of outstanding common stock. Different types of Dallas Texas Voting Agreements between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey regarding the sale of outstanding common stock may include: 1. Exclusive Voting Agreement: This type of agreement grants exclusive voting rights to a specific party or parties, preventing others from exercising their right to vote on the sale of the outstanding common stock. 2. Joint Voting Agreement: In a joint voting agreement, all parties involved mutually agree to vote their shares in a unified manner, ensuring collective decision-making regarding the sale of the outstanding common stock. 3. Proxy Voting Agreement: In this type of agreement, one party grants another party the authority to vote on their behalf. This could be used when one party has a significant number of shares and wants to consolidate voting power. 4. Majority Voting Agreement: A majority voting agreement stipulates that the sale of the outstanding common stock can only proceed if a certain majority of votes is achieved. This ensures that the decision is supported by a substantial number of shareholders. 5. Consent Voting Agreement: This agreement requires the explicit consent of each party involved in the sale of the outstanding common stock, ensuring that no actions are taken without full agreement and cooperation. These are just a few examples of the different types of Dallas Texas Voting Agreements that can be utilized in the context of Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey regarding the sale of outstanding common stock. The specific type of agreement chosen will depend on the preferences and objectives of the parties involved.

Dallas Texas Voting Agreement is a legally binding contract entered into by Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey regarding the sale of outstanding common stock. This agreement outlines the terms and conditions under which the parties will vote their shares in order to facilitate the sale of the stock. Keywords: Dallas Texas, Voting Agreement, Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, Kevin Casey, sale of outstanding common stock. Different types of Dallas Texas Voting Agreements between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey regarding the sale of outstanding common stock may include: 1. Exclusive Voting Agreement: This type of agreement grants exclusive voting rights to a specific party or parties, preventing others from exercising their right to vote on the sale of the outstanding common stock. 2. Joint Voting Agreement: In a joint voting agreement, all parties involved mutually agree to vote their shares in a unified manner, ensuring collective decision-making regarding the sale of the outstanding common stock. 3. Proxy Voting Agreement: In this type of agreement, one party grants another party the authority to vote on their behalf. This could be used when one party has a significant number of shares and wants to consolidate voting power. 4. Majority Voting Agreement: A majority voting agreement stipulates that the sale of the outstanding common stock can only proceed if a certain majority of votes is achieved. This ensures that the decision is supported by a substantial number of shareholders. 5. Consent Voting Agreement: This agreement requires the explicit consent of each party involved in the sale of the outstanding common stock, ensuring that no actions are taken without full agreement and cooperation. These are just a few examples of the different types of Dallas Texas Voting Agreements that can be utilized in the context of Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey regarding the sale of outstanding common stock. The specific type of agreement chosen will depend on the preferences and objectives of the parties involved.