Houston Texas Voting Agreement between Clearworks Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevan Casey regarding sale of outstanding common stock

• Category: Corporations - Public - Voting Agreements
• State: Multi-State
• City: Houston
• Control #: US-EG-9290
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

Voting Agreement between Clearworks Integration Services, Inc., United Computing Group, Inc., United Consulting Group, Inc. and Kevan Casey regarding sale of outstanding common stock dated December 30, 1999. 5 pages. Houston Texas Voting Agreement is a legally binding document established between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey, outlining the terms and conditions for the sale of outstanding common stock. This agreement governs the voting rights and obligations of the parties involved in the transaction. The Houston Texas Voting Agreement encompasses various key aspects of the stock sale, such as the number of shares involved, price per share, and the timeline for completion. It outlines the responsibilities and rights of each party, ensuring transparent and fair proceedings. The agreement establishes that all parties must vote in favor of the sale of outstanding common stock to ensure unanimous decision-making and collective agreement. Each party must exercise their voting rights and allocate their shares accordingly, as specified in the agreement. Houston Texas Voting Agreement between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey may have different types or variations depending on specific circumstances. These variations can include: 1. Unanimous Voting Agreement: This type of agreement requires unanimous consent from all parties involved for the sale of outstanding common stock. No party can dissent or oppose the decision. 2. Majority Voting Agreement: This agreement mandates that the sale of outstanding common stock can proceed if a majority of the parties involved vote in favor of it. The exact percentage required for a majority may be specified in the agreement. 3. Super majority Voting Agreement: This type of agreement demands a higher threshold of votes to approve the sale of outstanding common stock. Typically, a specific percentage of votes greater than a simple majority is needed, such as two-thirds or three-quarters. Regardless of the specific type of Houston Texas Voting Agreement, the objective remains the same: to provide a clear framework for the sale of outstanding common stock and ensure that all parties involved have equal say and opportunity to participate in the decision-making process.

Houston Texas Voting Agreement is a legally binding document established between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey, outlining the terms and conditions for the sale of outstanding common stock. This agreement governs the voting rights and obligations of the parties involved in the transaction. The Houston Texas Voting Agreement encompasses various key aspects of the stock sale, such as the number of shares involved, price per share, and the timeline for completion. It outlines the responsibilities and rights of each party, ensuring transparent and fair proceedings. The agreement establishes that all parties must vote in favor of the sale of outstanding common stock to ensure unanimous decision-making and collective agreement. Each party must exercise their voting rights and allocate their shares accordingly, as specified in the agreement. Houston Texas Voting Agreement between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey may have different types or variations depending on specific circumstances. These variations can include: 1. Unanimous Voting Agreement: This type of agreement requires unanimous consent from all parties involved for the sale of outstanding common stock. No party can dissent or oppose the decision. 2. Majority Voting Agreement: This agreement mandates that the sale of outstanding common stock can proceed if a majority of the parties involved vote in favor of it. The exact percentage required for a majority may be specified in the agreement. 3. Super majority Voting Agreement: This type of agreement demands a higher threshold of votes to approve the sale of outstanding common stock. Typically, a specific percentage of votes greater than a simple majority is needed, such as two-thirds or three-quarters. Regardless of the specific type of Houston Texas Voting Agreement, the objective remains the same: to provide a clear framework for the sale of outstanding common stock and ensure that all parties involved have equal say and opportunity to participate in the decision-making process.