Kings New York Voting Agreement between Clearworks Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevan Casey regarding sale of outstanding common stock

• Category: Corporations - Public - Voting Agreements
• State: Multi-State
• County: Kings
• Control #: US-EG-9290
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

Voting Agreement between Clearworks Integration Services, Inc., United Computing Group, Inc., United Consulting Group, Inc. and Kevan Casey regarding sale of outstanding common stock dated December 30, 1999. 5 pages. The Kings New York Voting Agreement between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey is a legal document that outlines the terms and conditions related to the sale of outstanding common stock within the aforementioned entities. This agreement aims to establish a unified decision-making process and voting rights regarding the sale and purchase of these stocks. The agreement is designed to ensure transparency, fairness, and efficiency in the process of selling outstanding common stock. It lays out specific guidelines and procedures that all parties involved must adhere to, in order to maintain a smooth and organized transaction. Some relevant keywords related to this voting agreement would include: 1. Kings New York: Referring to the specific jurisdiction or location where this voting agreement is established. 2. Voting Agreement: The legal document that outlines the terms and conditions for voting rights and decision-making processes. 3. Clear works Integration Services: One of the entities involved in the voting agreement. 4. United Computing Group: Another entity involved in the voting agreement. 5. United Consulting Group: Additional entity participating in the voting agreement. 6. Kevin Casey: An individual or entity representing their interest in the sale of outstanding common stock. 7. Sale of outstanding common stock: Referring to the specific action being taken within the agreement, which involves the transfer of ownership of stocks. Regarding the different types of Kings New York Voting Agreement between the mentioned entities, it is unclear from the provided information whether there are specific variations or categories. It is possible that the agreement may have multiple versions, each addressing different aspects or stages of the sale process. However, without further details, it is challenging to name specific types of this voting agreement.

The Kings New York Voting Agreement between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey is a legal document that outlines the terms and conditions related to the sale of outstanding common stock within the aforementioned entities. This agreement aims to establish a unified decision-making process and voting rights regarding the sale and purchase of these stocks. The agreement is designed to ensure transparency, fairness, and efficiency in the process of selling outstanding common stock. It lays out specific guidelines and procedures that all parties involved must adhere to, in order to maintain a smooth and organized transaction. Some relevant keywords related to this voting agreement would include: 1. Kings New York: Referring to the specific jurisdiction or location where this voting agreement is established. 2. Voting Agreement: The legal document that outlines the terms and conditions for voting rights and decision-making processes. 3. Clear works Integration Services: One of the entities involved in the voting agreement. 4. United Computing Group: Another entity involved in the voting agreement. 5. United Consulting Group: Additional entity participating in the voting agreement. 6. Kevin Casey: An individual or entity representing their interest in the sale of outstanding common stock. 7. Sale of outstanding common stock: Referring to the specific action being taken within the agreement, which involves the transfer of ownership of stocks. Regarding the different types of Kings New York Voting Agreement between the mentioned entities, it is unclear from the provided information whether there are specific variations or categories. It is possible that the agreement may have multiple versions, each addressing different aspects or stages of the sale process. However, without further details, it is challenging to name specific types of this voting agreement.