San Diego California Voting Agreement between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Matzkin regarding exchange of shares of capital stock

• Category: Corporations - Public - Voting Agreements
• State: Multi-State
• County: San Diego
• Control #: US-EG-9335
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

Voting Agreement between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Matzkin regarding exchange of shares of capital stock dated October 22, 1999. 6 pages. The San Diego California Voting Agreement between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin pertains to the exchange of shares of capital stock. This agreement outlines the terms and conditions that both parties agree to abide by during the voting process and subsequent exchange of shares. The agreement is designed to ensure that the voting rights and interests of shareholders are protected and properly executed. It typically includes provisions such as the number of shares being exchanged, the timing and method of exchange, and any restrictions or conditions attached to the transaction. Some relevant keywords related to this topic include: 1. San Diego, California: The location where the voting agreement is executed, highlighting the jurisdiction and legal framework governing the agreement. 2. Voting Agreement: A legally binding contract that outlines the rights and responsibilities of the parties involved in the voting process. 3. ID Recap, Inc: The name of the company involved in the agreement, representing one of the parties. 4. Steven R. Catkin: The individual or entity involved in the agreement as the counterparty to ID Recap, Inc. 5. Exchange of Shares: The process through which the existing shares of capital stock are transferred or traded between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin. Different types of San Diego California Voting Agreements related to the exchange of shares of capital stock between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin may include: 1. Majority Voting Agreement: This type of agreement would require a specific majority threshold of the votes for the exchange of shares to be approved. For example, it may stipulate that at least 75% of the voting shareholders must agree to the exchange. 2. Unanimous Voting Agreement: In this scenario, all the shareholders must unanimously agree to the exchange of shares for it to proceed. This type of agreement ensures that every shareholder has an equal say in the transaction. 3. Time-bound Voting Agreement: This type of agreement may impose a specific timeframe within which the voting process should be completed. It ensures efficiency and sets deadlines to prevent indefinite delays. 4. Escrow Voting Agreement: In an escrow voting agreement, a neutral third-party (escrow agent) holds the shares being exchanged until the agreed-upon conditions or contingencies are met. This type of agreement provides an added layer of security and safeguards the interests of both parties. 5. Restrictive Voting Agreement: This form of agreement may include provisions that restrict or limit the voting rights for certain shareholders in specific circumstances. For example, it could stipulate that founders cannot vote on share exchanges that would result in a change of control. These variations demonstrate how the San Diego California Voting Agreement between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin can take different forms to suit the specific needs and requirements of the parties involved in the exchange of shares of capital stock.

The San Diego California Voting Agreement between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin pertains to the exchange of shares of capital stock. This agreement outlines the terms and conditions that both parties agree to abide by during the voting process and subsequent exchange of shares. The agreement is designed to ensure that the voting rights and interests of shareholders are protected and properly executed. It typically includes provisions such as the number of shares being exchanged, the timing and method of exchange, and any restrictions or conditions attached to the transaction. Some relevant keywords related to this topic include: 1. San Diego, California: The location where the voting agreement is executed, highlighting the jurisdiction and legal framework governing the agreement. 2. Voting Agreement: A legally binding contract that outlines the rights and responsibilities of the parties involved in the voting process. 3. ID Recap, Inc: The name of the company involved in the agreement, representing one of the parties. 4. Steven R. Catkin: The individual or entity involved in the agreement as the counterparty to ID Recap, Inc. 5. Exchange of Shares: The process through which the existing shares of capital stock are transferred or traded between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin. Different types of San Diego California Voting Agreements related to the exchange of shares of capital stock between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin may include: 1. Majority Voting Agreement: This type of agreement would require a specific majority threshold of the votes for the exchange of shares to be approved. For example, it may stipulate that at least 75% of the voting shareholders must agree to the exchange. 2. Unanimous Voting Agreement: In this scenario, all the shareholders must unanimously agree to the exchange of shares for it to proceed. This type of agreement ensures that every shareholder has an equal say in the transaction. 3. Time-bound Voting Agreement: This type of agreement may impose a specific timeframe within which the voting process should be completed. It ensures efficiency and sets deadlines to prevent indefinite delays. 4. Escrow Voting Agreement: In an escrow voting agreement, a neutral third-party (escrow agent) holds the shares being exchanged until the agreed-upon conditions or contingencies are met. This type of agreement provides an added layer of security and safeguards the interests of both parties. 5. Restrictive Voting Agreement: This form of agreement may include provisions that restrict or limit the voting rights for certain shareholders in specific circumstances. For example, it could stipulate that founders cannot vote on share exchanges that would result in a change of control. These variations demonstrate how the San Diego California Voting Agreement between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin can take different forms to suit the specific needs and requirements of the parties involved in the exchange of shares of capital stock.