Cook Illinois is a legal term referring to a specific type of motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. This motion is typically filed in cases where prejudicial statements have been made during the trial, potentially swaying the jury's decision and compromising the overall fairness of the proceedings. The purpose of this motion is to challenge the validity of the verdict based on the prejudicial statements that were allowed or presented during trial. In Cook Illinois, there are different types of motions that can be filed to address prejudicial statements at trial, including: 1. Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict: This motion is filed after a trial, requesting the court to overrule the jury's decision and enter a judgment in favor of the requesting party. It argues that the prejudicial statements made during the trial were so influential that they prevented a fair verdict from being reached. 2. Motion for a New Trial: This motion seeks to have the entire trial reheard, claiming that the prejudicial statements impacted the fairness of the proceedings and influenced the outcome. It asks the court to set aside the jury's verdict and order a new trial, free from the prejudicial statements that affected the previous proceedings. 3. Motion to Exclude Prejudicial Statements: Prior to trial, a party may file a motion to exclude or limit certain statements that they believe could potentially be prejudicial. This motion aims to prevent the statements from being presented or mentioned during the trial, ensuring a fair and impartial proceeding. 4. Motion to Strike Prejudicial Statements: During the trial, if prejudicial statements are made by a witness or attorney, a party may file a motion to strike those statements from the record. This motion requests that the statements be disregarded by the court and not considered by the jury in their decision-making process. Overall, Cook Illinois motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial, offer a means for addressing the impact of prejudicial statements on the fairness of a trial. By challenging the verdict or requesting a new trial, the goal is to protect the integrity of the judicial process and ensure that justice is served without undue influence from statements that could be deemed prejudicial.