King Washington Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Duces Tecum

• Category: Civil Procedure - Motions - Samples
• State: Multi-State
• County: King
• Control #: US-PI-0042
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form is a sample motion used in an attempt to quash a deposition subpoena duces tecum. The King Washington Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a legal document that is filed by an individual or party seeking to challenge or prevent the enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum in a deposition. This motion is a crucial tool used in the legal process to protect the rights and interests of the person being deposed. A subpoena duces tecum is a type of legal document that compels the production of documents or tangible evidence at a deposition. It requires the person or entity in possession of the requested documents to produce them and bring them to the deposition for examination. There are different types of King Washington Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum, which may vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances of the case. Here are a few common types: 1. Protective Order Motion: This type of motion seeks to prevent the disclosure or production of certain documents or information deemed privileged or confidential. It argues that the subpoenaed documents are irrelevant, overly burdensome, or protected by attorney-client privilege, work-product doctrine, doctor-patient confidentiality, or other applicable protections. 2. Undue Burden Motion: This motion asserts that complying with the subpoena duces tecum would cause an undue burden on the person or party being deposed. It argues that either the requested documents are not reasonably accessible, or that the effort, time, and expense required to produce them outweigh their potential relevance to the case. 3. Over breadth Motion: This type of motion challenges the breadth and scope of the subpoena duces tecum, arguing that it seeks documents or information that are not relevant to the issues in the case. It contends that the requested materials are overly broad or lack specificity, and therefore, the subpoena should be quashed or modified. 4. Fourth Amendment Motion: In certain cases, a person being deposed may argue that the subpoena duces tecum violates their Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. This motion asserts that the requested documents were unlawfully obtained or that the subpoena lacks probable cause and fails to meet the necessary legal standards. 5. Lack of Proper Service Motion: This type of motion challenges the validity of the subpoena duces tecum based on improper service. It contends that the subpoena was not appropriately delivered, served, or there was a failure to comply with legal requirements, such as notice or timing. In conclusion, the King Washington Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a crucial legal tool used to challenge or prevent the enforcement of a subpoena in a deposition. By filing this motion, individuals or parties seek to protect their rights, prevent undue burdens, ensure privacy or confidentiality, and limit the scope of the requested documents. The different types of motions under the King Washington jurisdiction may include protective order motions, undue burden motions, over breadth motions, Fourth Amendment motions, and lack of proper service motions.

The King Washington Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a legal document that is filed by an individual or party seeking to challenge or prevent the enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum in a deposition. This motion is a crucial tool used in the legal process to protect the rights and interests of the person being deposed. A subpoena duces tecum is a type of legal document that compels the production of documents or tangible evidence at a deposition. It requires the person or entity in possession of the requested documents to produce them and bring them to the deposition for examination. There are different types of King Washington Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum, which may vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances of the case. Here are a few common types: 1. Protective Order Motion: This type of motion seeks to prevent the disclosure or production of certain documents or information deemed privileged or confidential. It argues that the subpoenaed documents are irrelevant, overly burdensome, or protected by attorney-client privilege, work-product doctrine, doctor-patient confidentiality, or other applicable protections. 2. Undue Burden Motion: This motion asserts that complying with the subpoena duces tecum would cause an undue burden on the person or party being deposed. It argues that either the requested documents are not reasonably accessible, or that the effort, time, and expense required to produce them outweigh their potential relevance to the case. 3. Over breadth Motion: This type of motion challenges the breadth and scope of the subpoena duces tecum, arguing that it seeks documents or information that are not relevant to the issues in the case. It contends that the requested materials are overly broad or lack specificity, and therefore, the subpoena should be quashed or modified. 4. Fourth Amendment Motion: In certain cases, a person being deposed may argue that the subpoena duces tecum violates their Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. This motion asserts that the requested documents were unlawfully obtained or that the subpoena lacks probable cause and fails to meet the necessary legal standards. 5. Lack of Proper Service Motion: This type of motion challenges the validity of the subpoena duces tecum based on improper service. It contends that the subpoena was not appropriately delivered, served, or there was a failure to comply with legal requirements, such as notice or timing. In conclusion, the King Washington Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a crucial legal tool used to challenge or prevent the enforcement of a subpoena in a deposition. By filing this motion, individuals or parties seek to protect their rights, prevent undue burdens, ensure privacy or confidentiality, and limit the scope of the requested documents. The different types of motions under the King Washington jurisdiction may include protective order motions, undue burden motions, over breadth motions, Fourth Amendment motions, and lack of proper service motions.