Oakland Michigan Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Duces Tecum

• Category: Civil Procedure - Motions - Samples
• State: Multi-State
• County: Oakland
• Control #: US-PI-0042
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form is a sample motion used in an attempt to quash a deposition subpoena duces tecum. Oakland Michigan Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum refers to a legal document filed in the Oakland County, Michigan jurisdiction to request the court to invalidate or nullify a subpoena duces tecum issued for a deposition. A Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is typically filed by a party involved in a legal case who wants to object to the subpoena duces tecum issued by an opposing party. This motion aims to prevent the compelled production of documents, records, or other tangible evidence requested by the subpoena. Here are some relevant keywords related to Oakland Michigan Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum: 1. Oakland County, Michigan: Refers to the specific jurisdiction where this motion is filed. 2. Motion to Quash: A legal request seeking the court's intervention to nullify or invalidate a previous order or decision, in this case, a subpoena duces tecum. 3. Deposition Subpoena: A legal document compelling an individual to provide testimony under oath and often requires the production of specific documents or evidence. 4. Subpoena Ducks Cecum: A type of subpoena that specifically requests the production of documents, records, or other tangible evidence relevant to a legal case. 5. Objecting to a Subpoena: When a party disagrees with a subpoena and files a motion to quash it, they are essentially objecting to its validity or asserting reasons why compliance should not be required. Different types of Oakland Michigan Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum may include variations in the grounds for objection or specific circumstances. These could include: 1. Improper Service: When a subpoena is not served correctly, such as not being delivered to the correct party or not complying with the required legal procedures. 2. Over breadth: When a subpoena requests documents or materials that are not relevant or overly broad, exceeding the permissible scope of discovery. 3. Privilege or Confidentiality: When the requested documents or evidence are protected by attorney-client privilege, doctor-patient confidentiality, or any other legally recognized confidentiality or privilege. 4. Undue Burden: When compliance with the subpoena would impose significant hardships, such as excessive time, expense, or disruption to the subpoenaed party. 5. Lack of Relevance: When the requested documents or evidence do not have any material or pertinent connection to the legal case or are not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. In conclusion, an Oakland Michigan Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a legal document filed in the Oakland County, Michigan jurisdiction to object to the enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum for a deposition. This motion can be filed based on various grounds such as improper service, over breadth, privilege or confidentiality, undue burden, or lack of relevance.

Oakland Michigan Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum refers to a legal document filed in the Oakland County, Michigan jurisdiction to request the court to invalidate or nullify a subpoena duces tecum issued for a deposition. A Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is typically filed by a party involved in a legal case who wants to object to the subpoena duces tecum issued by an opposing party. This motion aims to prevent the compelled production of documents, records, or other tangible evidence requested by the subpoena. Here are some relevant keywords related to Oakland Michigan Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum: 1. Oakland County, Michigan: Refers to the specific jurisdiction where this motion is filed. 2. Motion to Quash: A legal request seeking the court's intervention to nullify or invalidate a previous order or decision, in this case, a subpoena duces tecum. 3. Deposition Subpoena: A legal document compelling an individual to provide testimony under oath and often requires the production of specific documents or evidence. 4. Subpoena Ducks Cecum: A type of subpoena that specifically requests the production of documents, records, or other tangible evidence relevant to a legal case. 5. Objecting to a Subpoena: When a party disagrees with a subpoena and files a motion to quash it, they are essentially objecting to its validity or asserting reasons why compliance should not be required. Different types of Oakland Michigan Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum may include variations in the grounds for objection or specific circumstances. These could include: 1. Improper Service: When a subpoena is not served correctly, such as not being delivered to the correct party or not complying with the required legal procedures. 2. Over breadth: When a subpoena requests documents or materials that are not relevant or overly broad, exceeding the permissible scope of discovery. 3. Privilege or Confidentiality: When the requested documents or evidence are protected by attorney-client privilege, doctor-patient confidentiality, or any other legally recognized confidentiality or privilege. 4. Undue Burden: When compliance with the subpoena would impose significant hardships, such as excessive time, expense, or disruption to the subpoenaed party. 5. Lack of Relevance: When the requested documents or evidence do not have any material or pertinent connection to the legal case or are not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. In conclusion, an Oakland Michigan Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a legal document filed in the Oakland County, Michigan jurisdiction to object to the enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum for a deposition. This motion can be filed based on various grounds such as improper service, over breadth, privilege or confidentiality, undue burden, or lack of relevance.