Hennepin Minnesota Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or in the Alternative, for a New Trial

• Category: Civil Actions - Personal Injury - Sample Motions
• State: Multi-State
• County: Hennepin
• Control #: US-PI-0182
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form is a sample motion filed by the plaintiff in a personal injury action requesting that the Court enter a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and disregard the jury verdict, or, in the alternative, to grant the plaintiff a new trial. Hennepin County, Minnesota, Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (NOV) or in the Alternative, for a New Trial is a legal procedure used to challenge a jury's decision in a civil or criminal case. This motion can be filed by either the plaintiff (the party who initiated the lawsuit) or the defendant (the party being sued). It is important to note that specific variations of this motion may exist, depending on the case type and circumstances. Some common types may include: 1. Civil Hennepin Minnesota Motion for NOV: In civil lawsuits, if the jury's verdict seems clearly against the weight of evidence presented, the party seeking to challenge the verdict can file a Motion for NOV. This motion argues that no reasonable jury could have reached the decision made, and as such, requests the court to set aside the verdict and enter a judgment in favor of the moving party. 2. Criminal Hennepin Minnesota Motion for NOV: In criminal cases, particularly when the defendant has been found guilty by a jury, the defense may file a Motion for NOV, arguing that the evidence presented was insufficient to support a guilty verdict. The defense asserts that no reasonable jury could have reached a guilty verdict based on the evidence, and thus requests the court to set aside the verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal. 3. Hennepin Minnesota Motion for New Trial: In addition to or instead of filing a Motion for NOV, a party may file a Motion for a New Trial. This motion seeks a reevaluation of the case by a new jury, claiming errors in the legal process or the jury's decision. The moving party must present substantial reasons supporting the need for a fresh trial, such as new evidence, juror misconduct, or improper instructions given to the jury. 4. "In the Alternative" Motions: It is common for litigants to combine the Motion for NOV and the Motion for New Trial by filing them in the alternative. This means that if the court denies the Motion for NOV, the moving party requests the court to grant a new trial as a fallback. By combining both motions, parties cover different legal grounds to challenge the jury's verdict and increase their chances of legal success. When filing any type of Hennepin Minnesota Motion for NOV or in the Alternative, for a New Trial, it is crucial to adhere to the applicable local rules, procedures, and deadlines specified by Hennepin County's jurisdiction. Consulting with a knowledgeable attorney specializing in civil or criminal law can provide valuable guidance throughout this legal process.

Hennepin County, Minnesota, Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (NOV) or in the Alternative, for a New Trial is a legal procedure used to challenge a jury's decision in a civil or criminal case. This motion can be filed by either the plaintiff (the party who initiated the lawsuit) or the defendant (the party being sued). It is important to note that specific variations of this motion may exist, depending on the case type and circumstances. Some common types may include: 1. Civil Hennepin Minnesota Motion for NOV: In civil lawsuits, if the jury's verdict seems clearly against the weight of evidence presented, the party seeking to challenge the verdict can file a Motion for NOV. This motion argues that no reasonable jury could have reached the decision made, and as such, requests the court to set aside the verdict and enter a judgment in favor of the moving party. 2. Criminal Hennepin Minnesota Motion for NOV: In criminal cases, particularly when the defendant has been found guilty by a jury, the defense may file a Motion for NOV, arguing that the evidence presented was insufficient to support a guilty verdict. The defense asserts that no reasonable jury could have reached a guilty verdict based on the evidence, and thus requests the court to set aside the verdict and enter a judgment of acquittal. 3. Hennepin Minnesota Motion for New Trial: In addition to or instead of filing a Motion for NOV, a party may file a Motion for a New Trial. This motion seeks a reevaluation of the case by a new jury, claiming errors in the legal process or the jury's decision. The moving party must present substantial reasons supporting the need for a fresh trial, such as new evidence, juror misconduct, or improper instructions given to the jury. 4. "In the Alternative" Motions: It is common for litigants to combine the Motion for NOV and the Motion for New Trial by filing them in the alternative. This means that if the court denies the Motion for NOV, the moving party requests the court to grant a new trial as a fallback. By combining both motions, parties cover different legal grounds to challenge the jury's verdict and increase their chances of legal success. When filing any type of Hennepin Minnesota Motion for NOV or in the Alternative, for a New Trial, it is crucial to adhere to the applicable local rules, procedures, and deadlines specified by Hennepin County's jurisdiction. Consulting with a knowledgeable attorney specializing in civil or criminal law can provide valuable guidance throughout this legal process.