Description: A Clark Nevada order overruling a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (NOV) is a legal decision made by a court in Clark County, Nevada in response to a motion filed by one of the parties involved in a trial. This type of order typically occurs during a civil case when the party that lost at trial seeks to overturn the jury's verdict and have judgment entered in their favor. Keywords: — Clark Nevada: Refers to the specific jurisdiction where the order is issued, indicating it is specific to Clark County, Nevada. — Order overruling: Indicates that the court has denied the motion for NOV, upholding the jury's decision. — Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (NOV): This is a legal motion filed by the losing party in a civil trial, requesting the court to set aside the jury's verdict and enter a judgment in their favor. NOV is typically sought when the losing party believes there was an error in the legal interpretation, misapplication of the law, or lack of evidence. Types of Clark Nevada Order Overruling Motion for NOV: Since the description does not specifically mention different types of Clark Nevada orders overruling a motion for NOV, it can be assumed that the content will discuss this type of order in general and will not differentiate between subtypes. However, if there are different types of Clark Nevada orders overruling motions for NOV, some potential examples could include: 1. Clark Nevada Order Overruling Motion for NOV Based on Legal Error: This type of order would be issued when the court determines that there was no legal error or misapplication of the law during the trial, leading to the denial of the motion for NOV. 2. Clark Nevada Order Overruling Motion for NOV Due to Sufficient Evidence: This order would be issued if the court finds that there was sufficient evidence presented during the trial to support the jury's verdict, thereby denying the motion for NOV. Remember, the specific types of Clark Nevada orders overruling a motion for NOV may vary based on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the case.