This form is the findings and orders of the Court on a Truancy Petition. This is an official form from the Washington Court System, which complies with all applicable laws and statutes. USLF amends and updates forms as is required by Washington statutes and law.
King Washington JU 13.0400 is a legal statute pertaining to truancy cases in the King County region of Washington State. The specific document referred to as the "Findings and Order on Truancy Petition" is a comprehensive report and ruling issued by the court after reviewing a truancy petition. In this document, the court outlines its findings and decisions regarding a truancy case, involving a student or students who have been consistently absent from school without valid reasons. It contains essential information including the identification of the parties involved, details of the truancy allegations, evidence presented, and the court's final judgment. Key aspects covered in the King Washington JU 13.0400 — Findings and Order on Truancy Petition may include: 1. Identification of parties: The document will clearly state the names of the petitioning party, usually the school district or other educational institution, and the respondents, typically the affected student(s) and their guardians. 2. Case overview: A summary of the truancy case, outlining the specific allegations, dates and periods of truancy, and any relevant information provided by the petitioner. 3. Evidence and witness testimonies: If applicable, the document will include a description of evidence presented by the petitioner, such as attendance records, witness statements, or official reports. Witness testimonies may also be included where relevant. 4. Analysis of relevant laws and regulations: The court will analyze the truancy petition in light of King Washington JU 13.0400 and any other applicable local, state, or federal laws related to student attendance. 5. Findings: Based on the evidence presented and legal analysis, the court will render its findings, which can include a determination of whether the student(s) in question have been truant, the frequency and duration of their truancy, and any contributing factors noted. 6. Remedial measures: The court may propose or prescribe specific remedies or actions required to address the truancy issue effectively. This can comprise attendance monitoring, counseling, participation in educational programs, or other interventions designed to address the root cause of truancy and improve attendance. 7. Court orders: The document will conclude with a clear and definitive court order, specifying the actions to be taken by the parties involved. These orders may include directives for the student(s), parents or guardians, and educational institutions regarding future attendance, compliance with the law, and consequences for non-compliance. Different types or variations of the "Findings and Order on Truancy Petition" within King Washington JU 13.0400 can occur due to the specific circumstances of each truancy case. Each case will have unique details, such as the students involved, schools or school districts, and evidence presented. However, the general structure and purpose of the document will remain consistent across cases.King Washington JU 13.0400 is a legal statute pertaining to truancy cases in the King County region of Washington State. The specific document referred to as the "Findings and Order on Truancy Petition" is a comprehensive report and ruling issued by the court after reviewing a truancy petition. In this document, the court outlines its findings and decisions regarding a truancy case, involving a student or students who have been consistently absent from school without valid reasons. It contains essential information including the identification of the parties involved, details of the truancy allegations, evidence presented, and the court's final judgment. Key aspects covered in the King Washington JU 13.0400 — Findings and Order on Truancy Petition may include: 1. Identification of parties: The document will clearly state the names of the petitioning party, usually the school district or other educational institution, and the respondents, typically the affected student(s) and their guardians. 2. Case overview: A summary of the truancy case, outlining the specific allegations, dates and periods of truancy, and any relevant information provided by the petitioner. 3. Evidence and witness testimonies: If applicable, the document will include a description of evidence presented by the petitioner, such as attendance records, witness statements, or official reports. Witness testimonies may also be included where relevant. 4. Analysis of relevant laws and regulations: The court will analyze the truancy petition in light of King Washington JU 13.0400 and any other applicable local, state, or federal laws related to student attendance. 5. Findings: Based on the evidence presented and legal analysis, the court will render its findings, which can include a determination of whether the student(s) in question have been truant, the frequency and duration of their truancy, and any contributing factors noted. 6. Remedial measures: The court may propose or prescribe specific remedies or actions required to address the truancy issue effectively. This can comprise attendance monitoring, counseling, participation in educational programs, or other interventions designed to address the root cause of truancy and improve attendance. 7. Court orders: The document will conclude with a clear and definitive court order, specifying the actions to be taken by the parties involved. These orders may include directives for the student(s), parents or guardians, and educational institutions regarding future attendance, compliance with the law, and consequences for non-compliance. Different types or variations of the "Findings and Order on Truancy Petition" within King Washington JU 13.0400 can occur due to the specific circumstances of each truancy case. Each case will have unique details, such as the students involved, schools or school districts, and evidence presented. However, the general structure and purpose of the document will remain consistent across cases.
